Loading…
· Private foundation
GARY BLACKWELL CHARITABLE
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$88k
Granted FY2025
25
Grants
9
Communities
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of GARY BLACKWELL CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
pasco
2019
—
2020
pasco
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
lymphoma
2025
foundlymphoma
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 25 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
- UCF COLLEGE OF NURSING$7,500
- THE ANGELUS$7,000
- H LEE MOFFIT CANCER CENTER$5,500
- LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,500
- FEEDING PASCO ELDERLY$5,000
- GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC$5,000
- ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
- METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$4,500
- UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$3,500
- UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$3,500
- SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$3,000
- MEALS ON WHEELS$3,000
- PASCO-HERNANDO STATE COLLEGE$3,000
- AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$3,000
- ALZHEIMER'S FAMILY ORG$3,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$455k · 31 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else
31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
31
9
Total granted
$455k
$12k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+59%
+67%
Still filing today
23%
11%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +32%
- TATHE ANGELUS9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +27%
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +97%
Funded once
- CBCOMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $3k
- LLLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY RESEARCone grant, 2022 · $2k
- PCPREMIERE COMMUNITY HEALTHone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Hope Clinic
Hope clinic is a private, non-profit organization in pamlico county, nc that provides free medical and dental care to low-income, uninsured adults. we provide basic health care, prescription medications, laboratory tests, medical supplies,…
Health
2
Samaritan Health & Wellness Center
To serve the uninsured and under-insured in lee county in a christ-centered environment with the knowledge that jesus christ is the only healer.
Health
3
The Florida Medical Clinic
To support individuals, children and families in need throughout hillsborough and pasco counties.
Health
4
The Poverello Center Inc
The poverello center, inc. provides nutritious food, services and basic living essentials with the highest degree of understanding, respect and love for individuals living with critical and chronic illnesses including hiv, in south florida.
—
5
Orlando Health Inc
Our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.
Health
6
Southeast Volusia Healthcare Corporation
The provision of medical care to the community served through the operation of a 109 bed hospital.
Recreation & Sports
7
The Pasco Home Inc
A transition home for men and women
Health
8
Jupiter Medical Center Inc
To deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve.
Health
9
Hope Clinic of Garland Inc
The organization provides free healthcare for patients who have a household income of 200% of the federal poverty level or less and are uninsured.
Health
10
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc
We heal. we teach. we innovate. care for everyone. every day.
Health
11
Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc
To improve health equality for our diverse south florida community by providing and increasing access to quality comprehensive primary care services.
Health
12
Primary Care Medical Services of
To provide access to health care services for our communities with emphasis on the uninsured and underinsured to improve the health and well-being of the community.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Health Clinic and the most unlike its peers is The Angelus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$400,950Health$45,000Human Services$27,000Education$6,500Philanthropy$5,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Duke Energy FoundationNC12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation GARY BLACKWELL CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Miracle of Love Inc — 12% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 593072334 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Gary Blackwell Charitable?
Find your warmest path to Gary Blackwell Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines