Skip to content
Ganpule Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Ganpule Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$104kFood & Nutrition$14kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$9kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,010
Median grant
9
States reached
$345k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FBO EDWARD JONES CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$9,492
CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL$4,011
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$4,011
SEWA INTERNATIONAL$4,011
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$4,002
SLO FOOD BANK$3,011
EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION$3,010
OXFAM$2,010
MERCY CORPS$2,010
FEEDING AMERICA$2,001
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$1,001
SAVE THE CHILDREN$1,001
UNICEF$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $3k → 12%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 8%EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $1k → 12%EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $1k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 15 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$139k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+16%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    7× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +4%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +89%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    7× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -5%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +163%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
2
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
3
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
6
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
7
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
8
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
11
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
12
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $18,774 · InternationalCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USAMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,519 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $13,510 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFSave The Children Federation Inc: $9,257 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $9,005 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $6,004 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INCPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,002 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,505 · International+4 more: $7,005 · International+4 moreIndividual grant recipient: $14,107 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC FBO EDWARD JONES CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $9,492 · OtherRENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATIO…MERCY CORPS: $8,014 · OtherMERCY CORPSOXFAM: $6,013 · OtherOXFAMIndividual grant recipient: $2,253 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $2,001 · OtherPARTNER IN HEALTH: $2,001 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,001 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $2,001 · Other+1 more: $1,001 · OtherSewa International Inc: $14,011 · Human ServicesSewa Internatio…EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $5,012 · Human ServicesEL CAMINO HOMEL…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,003 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…FOOD BANK COALITION OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: $6,013 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $2,001 · Food & NutritionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,001 · Religion
International$87,581Other$48,884Human Services$24,026Food & Nutrition$8,014Religion$2,001

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $18,774 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,519 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $14,011 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $13,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $9,257 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $9,005 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK COALITION OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: $6,013 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $6,004 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $5,012 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,003 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,002 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,505 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $2,002 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ganpule Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ganpule Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ganpule Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home