Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gallery Lyons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$630kEducation$288kAnimals$38kHealth$28kHousing & Shelter$13kHuman Services$11kYouth Development$11kReligion$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITBALE$130,000
HANOVER THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$2,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$1,000
CHOROIDEREMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,000
ST SPYRIDON GREEK CATHEDRAL$537
ST JUDE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $500 → 8%LET IT BE US: $3k → 14%LET IT BE US: $3k → 14%LET IT BE US: $3k → 14%LET IT BE US: $2k → 14%LET IT BE US: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$412k · 18 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$412k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+33%

Still filing today

44%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QU
    QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $191k · revenue +39%
  • PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $75k · revenue +48%
  • CH
    CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +208%

Funded once

  • RL
    ROGER L PUTNAM VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • VI
    VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • DP
    DETECTOGETHER - PREVIOUSLY 15-40 CONNECTION
    one grant, 2020 · $523
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
6
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Hopehealth

Our purpose is to offer our skills and hearts to help patients and families live each day with hope and dignity.

Human Services
9
Umass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent)

Umass memorial health care, inc. is committed to improving the health of the people of central new england through excellence in clinical care, services, teaching, and research.

Health
10
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
11
Healthix Inc

The mission of healthix inc. is to create an achievable, sustainable and replicable model for integrating clinical information across multiple health care organizations which supports new york state and federal strategic health information…

Public Benefit
12
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc; the most unlike its peers is Choroideremia Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $630,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $191,000 · EducationQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITYPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $75,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGE+1 more: $8,115 · EducationFIDELITY CHARITBALE: $130,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITBALECANINE COMPANIONS: $37,500 · OtherCANINE COMPANIONSBOSTON HEALTH CARE: $16,000 · OtherBOSTON HEALTH CARELIGHTKEEPERS: $15,000 · OtherLIGHTKEEPERSBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS: $12,665 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH: $10,000 · OtherUMASS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+32 more: $24,633 · Other+32 moreLET IT BE US: $10,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $75 · Human ServicesCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC: $10,200 · Youth DevelopmentHUMANITY RISES INC: $4,500 · InternationalCALMER CHOICE INC: $500 · HealthHEROES IN TRANSITION INC: $250 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 · HealthALS ONE INC: $108 · HealthCHELSEA JEWISH LIFECARE INC: $100 · Health
Community Improvement$630,000Education$274,115Other$255,798Human Services$10,575Youth Development$10,200International$4,500Health$1,208

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $630,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $191,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC: $10,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLET IT BE US: $10,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budget365Z FOUNDATION INC: $8,115 over 3y, 12% of budgetHUMANITY RISES INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,517 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHOROIDEREMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALMER CHOICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES IN TRANSITION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFALMOUTH ROAD RACE INC: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHY ME INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHELSEA JEWISH LIFECARE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BASEBALL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $56 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LET IT BE US ↗
  • Who funds 365Z FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITY RISES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOROIDEREMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CALMER CHOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEROES IN TRANSITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH ROAD RACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ16.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Coghlin Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Giblin Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Global Impact · American Endowment Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gallery Lyons Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gallery Lyons Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Calmer Choice Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Christ Child Society of Naples Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Baseball Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Als One Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Heroes in Transition Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gallery Lyons’ filings →

More from the funding graph