· Private foundation
Galanta Foundation Inc Co Royal Wine Corp
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $27,500 |
| BNOS ESTHER MALKA | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
25 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2019–2022 · $775k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2022 · $465k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2017–2019 · $161k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $100k
- CBCONG BNOS TORAS EMACHU INCone grant, 2018 · $70k
- BTBINYAN TORAH INCone grant, 2019 · $70k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
Religious education programs to stimulate development of young individuals through the study of the talmud and the bible and related jewish works.
The organization issues grants to individuals for educational and religious purposes.
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
To provide financial support for non-profit religious institutions.
To provide religious Jewish education.
To provide religious mentoring and spiritual counseling to orthodox teenage students
To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
To operate a yeshiva (religious school)to promote and encourage the study of torah and other jewish works and teachings. to stimulate and foster the education and religious development of young jewish men of high school age. to provide a…
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · Jewish Communal Fund · Keren Ish Foundation · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Fund for Life Foundation Inc · Sdei Israel Foundation Inc · Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc · S&W Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Galanta Foundation Inc Co Royal Wine Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Galanta Foundation Inc Co Royal Wine Corp. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 6% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Galanta Foundation Inc Co Royal Wine Corp?
Find your warmest path to Galanta Foundation Inc Co Royal Wine Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Galanta Foundation Inc Co Royal Wine’s filings →