Skip to content
Gabriel & Claudia Navarro Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gabriel & Claudia Navarro Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Youth Development$191kEducation$161kPhilanthropy$153kHealth$105kReligion$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHuman Services$1kCrime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$900
Median grant
1
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NETWORK FOR GOOD$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$5,000
MISIONES PAX INC$1,000
DANI GIRL FOUNDATION$900
DANCERS WITH CANCER$300
VOICES FOR CHILDREN$230
ST AUGUSTINE$80
BLUE MISSIONS$54
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Ronald McDonald House: $200 → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%Chasin a Dream Foundation: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
OH
CA
AZ
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$573k · 13 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
25

Total granted

$573k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+20%

Still filing today

54%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    3× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +48%
  • BH
    Baptist Health Care Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +66%
  • DG
    DANI GIRL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NAVARRO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • GF
    GREENLIGHT FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Access to Cancer Care Foundation
—
2
The Cancer Foundation Inc
—
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
5
Discovery to Cure Foundation Inc
Health
6
Minnie Miracle Foundation
Human Services
7
Sacred Heart Foundation Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-center, holistic care which…

Health
8
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
9
Ayudame a Vivir Foundation Inc

Provide financial support and the necessary resources for the treatment of pediatric cancer in guatemala and the united states, through fundraising in florida. contribute to providing comprehensive treatment at no cost to children and…

Philanthropy
10
Almas Children Cancer Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Bacardi Family Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The Caruso Family Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central and Northern Arizona; the most unlike its peers is Misiones Pax Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $190,298 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSIndividual grant recipient: $82,947 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HERBERT BUSINESS SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HERBERT BUSINESS SCHOOLARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI: $22,800 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMINETWORK FOR GOOD: $20,000 · Other+25 more: $24,864 · Other+25 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $75,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNI…Baptist Health Care Inc: $20,200 · HealthBaptist Health C…DANI GIRL FOUNDATION INC: $3,960 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthNAVARRO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · PhilanthropyNAVARRO FAMILY…University of Miami: $55,000 · EducationTHE NAVARRO FOUNDATION: $35,000 · AnimalsGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $200 · Human Services
Other$390,909Health$99,410Philanthropy$90,000Education$55,000Animals$35,000Community Improvement$20,000Human Services$3,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAVARRO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health Care Inc: $20,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANI GIRL FOUNDATION INC: $3,960 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISIONES PAX INC: $2,250 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetDANCERS WITH CANCER INC: $550 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVoice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida: $230 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST THOMAS THE APOSTLE INC: $165 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAVARRO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds THE NAVARRO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DANI GIRL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISIONES PAX INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCERS WITH CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE FREEDGE INC THE ROOTS COLLEVTIVE CORP ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Voice for Children Inc AKA Voices for Children of Florida ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gabriel & Claudia Navarro Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gabriel & Claudia Navarro Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Baptist Health Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gabriel & Claudia Navarro Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gabriel & Claudia Navarro Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gabriel & Claudia Navarro’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home