· Private foundation
G Peabody & Rose Gardner Charitable Tr
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k10 grants · $248k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $166k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Kestrel FoundationProtect Downeast | $62,254 |
| The Wolfsonian | $51,657 |
| The Municipal Building Proiect | $51,657 |
| Aquidneck Land Trust | $26,491 |
| Trinity Church | $26,491 |
| Eastern Maine Conservation Initiative | $26,491 |
| CCN Historic Building Preservation Foundation | $26,491 |
| Preservation Society of Newport County | $26,491 |
| Redwood Library and Athenaeum | $26,491 |
| Georgetown Ministry Center | $25,829 |
| Roque Island Community Initiative | $25,829 |
| Newport Hospital Foundaation | $21,193 |
| Newport Country Club Preservation Foundation | $15,895 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 32% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMEastern Maine Conservation Initiative3× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue +5% · 37% of their budget
- TCTHE COMPANY OF THE REDWOOD LIBRARY AND ATHENAEUM2× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +1%
- IIIsland Institute2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- SCSierra Club Maineone grant, 2021 · $2k
NEWPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +76%- CFCenter for Maine Coast Fisheriesone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History
To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.
Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…
The nantucket historical association preserves and interprets the history of nantucket through its programs, collections, and properties, in order to promote the island's significance and foster an appreciation of it among all audiences.
Preserve/Maintain Victoria Mansion
Our mission is to permanently conserve and steward natural resources across our island and mainland communities for the benefit of current and future generations.
Maine Historical Society, founded in 1822, is a private non-profit whose mission is to preserve and share Maine's story. Based in Portland, we work closely with communities and partners throughout the state, and serve a statewide and…
Aipc works to preserve and improve the environment, economy and quality of life on aquidneck island to ensure that the island remains a great place to live, work, play and thrive.
Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…
The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Preservation Society of Newport County and the most unlike its peers is Georgetown Ministry Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Eastern Maine Conservation Initiative ↗
- Who funds THE COMPANY OF THE REDWOOD LIBRARY AND ATHENAEUM ↗
- Who funds THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds CCN HISTORIC BUILDING PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Newport Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT COUNTRY CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds Island Institute ↗
- Who funds Islesboro Islands Trust ↗
- Who funds ISLESBORO COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries ↗
- Who funds EAGLE HILL INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · Hamilton Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Bardes Fund · Winifred M Purdy Foundation · The Anne and David B Ford Jr Foundation · Hamilton Family Charitable Trust · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The New York Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization G Peabody & Rose Gardner Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.