Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

G Fredrick Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$702k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$1.3MInternational$1.3MCivil Rights$659kHuman Services$572kPhilanthropy$525kRecreation & Sports$520kFood & Nutrition$367kArts & Culture$316kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $189k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$675k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPOWER ME ACADEMY$250,000
OSA CONSERVATION$139,000
INNOCEANA$50,000
MUSIC HEALS INTERNATIONAL$40,000
HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT$40,000
AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA$32,000
ONE TREE PLANTED$25,000
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$25,000
CLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY$20,000
EARTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
GRASSROOTS AID PARTNERSHIP$15,000
SFFILM$15,000
NORTH STAR FUND$10,000
HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT$10,000
HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $477k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WIN WIN GIVE INC: $200k → 10%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND: $40k → 13%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $40k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $40k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $40k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $30k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $27k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $20k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $20k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $10k → 8%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 29 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
20

Total granted

$4.3M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+2%

Still filing today

79%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $341k · revenue +189%
  • HN
    Human Needs Project Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $237k · revenue +45%
  • AO
    AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $219k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • RC
    REDFORD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -38%
  • WW
    WIN WIN GIVE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue -99%
  • CT
    CRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATIO INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $170k · revenue +104%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
2
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
3
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
4
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
5
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
6
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
9
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
10
Groundswell International Inc

Groundswell International strenghtens communities to build healthy farming and food systems from the ground up.

International
11
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
12
Reforest the Tropics Incorporated

Development of programs to offset personal and corporate carbon emissions through reforestation in the tropics.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sagrada Botanical Gardens. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%20%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%29%35–55yr13%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%24%5–10yr20%34%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr13%0%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/52
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,926

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
34/51
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OSA CONSERVATION — $244,000 · OtherOSA CONSERVATIONCRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATIO INSTITUTE INC — $170,000 · OtherCRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATIO INS…NORTH STAR FUND INC — $149,000 · OtherNORTH STAR FUND INCSan Francisco Film Society — $145,000 · OtherSan Francisco Film SocietyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $140,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP F…INNOCEANA — $140,000 · OtherINNOCEANABread and Roses Community Fund — $103,000 · OtherM4BLCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $93,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PARTNERS — $90,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH AMERICA — $85,000 · OtherPROJECT BIOME INC — $150,000 · OtherPROJECT BIOME INC+20 more — $546,000 · Other+20 moreGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $340,900 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERNATION…AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $219,000 · InternationalAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA I…THOUSAND CURRENTS — $212,800 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTSOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC — $170,000 · InternationalOPERATION CALIFORNIA I…Alliance for Global Justice Corp — $140,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Ju…EARTH University Foundation Inc — $60,000 · International+4 more — $62,500 · InternationalONE TREE PLANTED INC — $295,000 · PhilanthropyONE TREE PLAN…TIDES FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDAT…Groundswell Fund — $132,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell F…RESOURCE GENERATION INC — $73,400 · PhilanthropyRESOURCE GENE…NOVO MUNDO FOUNDATION — $30,000 · PhilanthropyREDFORD CENTER INC — $250,000 · EnvironmentREDFORD CEN…GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $238,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREE…AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE OF MARIN — $97,000 · EnvironmentAGRICULTURA…Sagrada Botanical Gardens — $30,000 · EnvironmentEmpower Me Academy — $520,000 · Recreation & SportsEmpower M…Human Needs Project Inc — $237,000 · Human ServicesWIN WIN GIVE INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesMUSIC HEALS INTERNATIONAL — $292,250 · Arts & CultureAUBIN PICTURES INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY — $70,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,145,400International$1,205,200Philanthropy$730,400Environment$615,000Recreation & Sports$520,000Human Services$477,000Arts & Culture$463,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEmpower Me Academy — $520,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $340,900 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC — $295,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSIC HEALS INTERNATIONAL — $292,250 over 7y, 53% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $238,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHuman Needs Project Inc — $237,000 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $219,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $212,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLE TO CRADLE PRODUCTS INNOVATIO INSTITUTE INC — $170,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC — $170,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPROJECT BIOME INC — $150,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNORTH STAR FUND INC — $149,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSan Francisco Film Society — $145,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $140,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetINNOCEANA — $140,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $140,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGroundswell Fund — $132,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBread and Roses Community Fund — $103,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAUBIN PICTURES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetAGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE OF MARIN — $97,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY GREENHOUSE PARTNERS — $90,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetRESOURCE GENERATION INC — $73,400 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY — $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEARTH University Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $57,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRESIST INC — $47,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDEFY VENTURES INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST — $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSagrada Botanical Gardens — $30,000 over 1y, 88% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRASSROOTS AID PARTNERSHIP INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ANIMAL RESCUE US INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHERWOOD FORESTRY SERVICE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR NATURE CONSERVATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOICES PROJECT USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRedwood Lions Memorial Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetABADA-CAPOEIRA SAN FRANCISCO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincTides FoundationThe Chicago Community…Marin Community Found…Jewish Communal FundAmalgamated Charitabl…The Robert Wood Johns…The San Francisco Fou…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Surdna Foundation IncSilicon Valley Commun…American Endowment Fo…
ImpactassetsincMD17.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Surdna Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization G Fredrick Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to G Fredrick Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to G Fredrick Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines