· Private foundation
Fundacion Good Bunny Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $107k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UN VERANO CONTIGO SUMMER CAMP | $721,139 |
| Individual grant recipient | $307,397 |
| Individual grant recipient | $106,802 |
| FASHION DESIGN WORKSHOPS | $28,884 |
| FUNDACION RIMAS INC | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,770 |
| SAFE CHILDREN COALITION | $10,000 |
| MAKE MUSIC HAPPEN | $10,000 |
| FEDERACION DE BALONESTO DE PUERTO R | $7,300 |
| SOTERO FIGUEROA SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA PUERTO RICO COUNCIL | $1,500 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY OF PR INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FRFUNDACION RIMAS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $49k · revenue +76%
- MCMAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2023 · $48k · revenue +226%
- MMMAKE MUSIC HAPPEN CORPORATION2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $110k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $37k
- FSFUNDACION SILA M CALDERON INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conservation of natural resources
Promote nature and cultural tourism which in turn generates forms of sustainable development more jobs and economic benefits for the Region. Establish and strengthen regional alliances in Eastern-Central Regions of Puerto Rico for the…
Environmental and water protection and education
Promoting cultural social and sports activities improving the quality of life and the economic and social conditions of culebra pr; preserving the environment culture and history of the island of culebra pr.
Medical asst to under develop areas
Research, rescue, rehabilitation, education and conservation of marine fauna, particularly whales, dolphins and manatees in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean area.
Basura Cero is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting a sustainable Puerto Rico that maximizes the value of products and materials, while minimizing waste generation and resource depletion, all in the interest of safeguarding…
We are organize under the laws of the Commonwealth of PR to operate exclusively for charitable Purposes. We are a cultural and arthistic group that performs theatrical and musical shows of the cultural music and folklore of PR.
Promote the Study of Natural Resources
Limpiar puerto rico inc is a non-profit organization dedicated to educating about environmental conservation, recycling, and the cleanup of beaches and coastal areas throughout puerto rico.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fundacion Rimas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fundacion Sila M Calderon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUNDACION RIMAS INC ↗
- Who funds MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION SILA M CALDERON INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE MUSIC HAPPEN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Coalicion Pro Corredor Ecologico Del Noreste Inc ↗
- Who funds RESCATE PLAYAS BORINQUEN CORP ↗
- Who funds COCO PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds Grupo Tortuguero 7 Quillas San Juan Inc ↗
- Who funds ACS OF PUERTO RICO INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fundacion Good Bunny Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fundacion Good Bunny Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fundacion Good Bunny Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.