· Public charity
Fund for Investigative Journalism Inc
The organization provides critical support to independent journalists to investigate news stories regarding corruption, malfeasance, exploitation, misappropriation of funds in the public and private sectors.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $91,221 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $621,161 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $529,940 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UC BERKELEY | $14,994 |
| GRIST | $14,750 |
| IN THEIR HANDS LLC | $10,000 |
| CALMATTERS | $10,000 |
| INVESTIGATEWEST | $10,000 |
| THE UTAH INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM PROJECT | $8,500 |
| BANGOR DAILY NEWS | $8,027 |
| INVISIBLE INSTITUTE | $7,500 |
| THE ADVOCATE | $7,450 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IInvestigateWest6× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +40%
- WIWCIJ INC3× · 2021–2023 · $62k · revenue +105%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC PRESS4× · 2017–2023 · $44k · revenue +116%
Funded once
- SFSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INCone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +12%
- ALArizona Local Postgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +65%
- PPPARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +243%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.
To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.
Trusting News improves the quality of news reporting by studying trust in news and training and coaching journalists to demonstrate credibility and actively earn trust. Their work equips thousands of journalists every year to better…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Canary Media is an independent, nonprofit newsroom covering the transition to clean energy.
To provide credible reporting and commentary on its website (counterpunch.org) and through its podcast, helping readers make informed and balanced assessments - vital for a healthy democratic society - on the public issues of the day.
Citizens news guild educates the public by publishing non-partisan state and local news.
IMI amplifies the reach and impact of the work produced by our partner journalists,public intellectuals and editorial teams on the leading issues of our times. The goal is to educate, inspire, and collaborate with movements and visionaries…
The mission of the springfield daily citizen is to inform our community and be a catalyst for good.
Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.
Mission:To provide ideology-free media platforms representing balanced news and educational forums to inform and increase critical thinking and engagement.
States newsroom is the nation's largest state-focused nonprofit news organization, with reporting from every capital. every newsroom is led by a veteran local journalist with deep knowledge of the state's political history and media…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Center for Government Accountability Inc and the most unlike its peers is American University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds InvestigateWest ↗
- Who funds WCIJ INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC PRESS ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING ↗
- Who funds Honolulu Civil Beat Inc ↗
- Who funds GREY MATTERS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING INC ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TEXAS DEMOCRACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL & MAIN ↗
- Who funds CalMatters ↗
- Who funds INVESTIGATIVE NEWSOURCE ↗
- Who funds Grist Magazine Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC ↗
- Who funds VOICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Local Post ↗
- Who funds PARTICIPATORY POLITICS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Informed California Foundation DBA - Open Vallejo ↗
- Who funds WYOFILE ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA HEALTH NEWS INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA NEWSPAPER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds FUNDAMEDIOS INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Institute for Nonprofit News · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Groundtruth Project Inc · Local Independent Online News Publishers Inc · Pro Publica Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Reva and David Logan Foundation · The Lenfest Institute for Journalism Special Asset Fund of Tpf · Solutions Journalism Network Inc · American Journalism Project Inc · John S and James L Knight Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fund for Investigative Journalism Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.