Skip to content
Fuller Lawernce C Jr Mem Diab Fd at a glance

· Private foundation

Fuller Lawernce C Jr Mem Diab Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$234kReligion$45kEducation$25kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$801k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$25,300
SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANA$14,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 6%LANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL: $7k → 7%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN: $15k → 11%DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AFTER PANCREAS TRAN: $9k → 22%DIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION: $8k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $14k → 13%JDRF INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 6%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $15k → 10%GREATER VALLEY YMCA: $10k → 11%SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANA: $15k → 22%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%JDRF INTERNATIONAL: $9k → 14%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 6%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $15k → 10%GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO: $12k → 11%SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANA: $15k → 22%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $8k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $5k → 6%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $13k → 10%GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO: $10k → 11%SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANA: $10k → 22%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $9k → 10%GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO: $8k → 11%SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANA: $8k → 22%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $8k → 10%SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANA: $5k → 22%CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES: $8k → 10%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 6 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
6

Total granted

$232k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $88k · revenue +19%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +124%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2018–2019 · $19k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • GV
    GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • GV
    GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -51%
  • DR
    DIABETIC RETINOPATHY AFTER PANCREAS TRAN
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
2
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
3
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
The Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund Inc
—
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
American Diabetes Association

The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve the lives of all people affected by diabetes.

Health
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
12
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lankenau Institute for Medical Research; the most unlike its peers is Chespenn Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT: $52,200 · OtherSUGGA MAMAS DIABETES PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENTGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSO: $29,800 · OtherGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSODIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $23,750 · OtherDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN: $15,000 · OtherGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIANGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONDIABETIC RETINOPATHY AFTER PANCREAS TRAN: $8,750 · OtherDIABETIC RETINOPATHY AFTER PANCREAS TRANLANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $7,000 · OtherCHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $87,550 · HealthCHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INCCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $20,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINEBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $18,750 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $7,800 · HealthDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INCDIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION: $7,800 · HealthDIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTIONTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $25,300 · EducationTHOMAS JE…
Other$146,500Health$141,900Education$25,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHESPENN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $87,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $25,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $18,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $7,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH CONNECTION: $7,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fuller Lawernce C Jr Mem Diab Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fuller Lawernce C Jr Mem Diab Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fuller Lawernce C Jr Mem Diab Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home