Skip to content

· Private foundation

Friends of Jimmy Miller Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$224kHuman Services$150kHealth$144kEducation$74kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$16kPhilanthropy$16kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MTA SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC$1,000
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NEW HAVEN CHAPTER$275
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%CMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE & CLUB: $32k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE & CLUB: $24k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE CLUB: $24k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE CLUB: $22k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE CLUB: $15k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE CLUB: $10k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS VILLAGE CLUB: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$658k · 25 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$658k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+58%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $135k · revenue +44%
  • CB
    CLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $130k · revenue +44%
  • SM
    ST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $41k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CF
    CT FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Community Programs of Ct

The children's community programs of connecticut, inc., is a nonprofit, multi-service agency whose mission is to provide diverse and creative support services to children and families throughout connecticut.

Health
2
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
3
Community Preparatory School

Community preparatory school is an independent private school, serving grades 4 to 8, striving to empower our diverse student body to reach full academic and leadership potential while building a beloved community.

Education
4
Camp Workcoeman Alumni Association Incorporated
Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Waterbury

To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
6
Connecticut Partnership for Children Inc

Connecticut partnership for children, inc., is dedicated to supporting low- income children throughout connecticut, by working with their families and the communities in which they live.

Human Services
7
Brunswick School Inc

Brunswick school, inc. is a day school for boys in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. the purpose of the school is to educate the "whole boy". it does so by helping boys and young men - without regard to culture, ethnicity or religion…

Education
8
Kids Scholarship Fund Inc

The kids' scholarship fund helps connecticut children from low-income families reach their full potential by providing equal access to a high-quality, foundational k-8 education through need-based scholarships that empower families to…

Education
9
The Christian Academy

The christian academy provides christian education to 300 students from kindergarten to 12th grade. the christian academy is a college-preparatory school.

—
10
Covenant Preparatory School Inc

To provide young men from underserved communities the foundation required to successfully pursue higher education, to develop the strength of their character and to inspire them to live with integrity as leaders committed to their…

Education
11
Western New York Maritime Charter School

Education of students

Education
12
Connecticut Parent Advocacy Center Incorporated

The Organization provides wide ranging support for families whose children receive special education services or those who suspect their child may have a disability, and provides important advocacy to improve special education outcomes in…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Community School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC: $130,000 · OtherCLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INCHAMDEN CHILD CENTER: $113,000 · OtherHAMDEN CHILD CENTERBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEY: $24,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LOWER NAUGATUCK VALLEYFAMILY CENTER OF NEW HAVEN: $23,500 · OtherMARINE CADETS OF AMERICA: $20,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAUGATUCK: $15,500 · Other+20 more: $130,100 · Other+20 moreBOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $134,750 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE…+1 more: $3,750 · Human ServicesST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC: $40,500 · EducationBooker T Washington Academy Inc: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $525 · EducationUMPS CARE CHARITIES INC: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Rising Sun Inc: $13,500 · Health
Other$457,100Human Services$138,500Education$48,025Youth Development$25,500Health$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC: $134,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC: $130,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC: $40,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetUMPS CARE CHARITIES INC: $23,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetMARINE CADETS OF AMERICA: $20,500 over 7y, 17% of budgetCamp Rising Sun Inc: $13,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetGREATER WATERBURY CAMPERSHIP FUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMITY CHARITABLE TRUST FUND: $7,250 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBooker T Washington Academy Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NEW HAVEN CHAPTER: $275 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIFFORD BEERS COMMUNITY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARTIN DE PORRES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds UMPS CARE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CADETS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Camp Rising Sun Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WATERBURY CAMPERSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMITY CHARITABLE TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds Booker T Washington Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds CMAK SANDY HOOK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION NEW HAVEN CHAPTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ion Bank Foundation IncCT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Newalliance Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friends of Jimmy Miller Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friends of Jimmy Miller Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 75%
  • Clifford Beers Community Care Center Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Village Inc: 32% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Friends of Jimmy Miller Inc?

Find your warmest path to Friends of Jimmy Miller Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Friends of Jimmy Miller’s filings →

More from the funding graph