Skip to content

· Private foundation

Free Yourself Charitable Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Religion$102kAnimals$15kHealth$12kEducation$11kArts & Culture$7kRecreation & Sports$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k16 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC$10,000
PEYTONS K9S$7,000
GREENSBURG VFD DIVE TEAM$5,000
GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY$4,821
ALL BUT FORGOTTEN$3,000
PITTSBURGH AVIATION ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PENNSYLVANIA STATE ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM$2,000
WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC$2,000
AEROBIC CENTER LYNCHFIELD$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PET FRIENDS INC$2,000
FAITH FORWARD INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GREENSBURG VFD DIVE TEAM: $5k → 10%GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $5k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM: $2k → 12%PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $10k → 12%AEROBIC CENTER LYNCHFIELD: $2k → 10%PITTSBURGH AVIATION ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $3k → 11%WAYWARD WHISKERS: $2k → 10%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 11%JEANNETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 10%PEYTONS K9S: $7k → 11%FAITH FORWARD INC: $1k → 10%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 → 11%LATROBE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 10%FAITH FORWARD INC: $1k → 10%KEYSTONE BULLDOG RESCUE OF SW PA LLC: $500 → 10%LARIMER VFD: $2k → 10%IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH: $100k → 10%QUEEN OF ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 10%ALL BUT FORGOTTEN: $3k → 10%PET FRIENDS INC: $2k → 10%IRWIN VFD: $2k → 10%WHITE OAK ROTARY CLUB: $500 → 10%WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bark Ark and Purr Rescue

Public Animal Rescue

Animals
2
Animal Rescuers Without Borders

Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.

Animals
3
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
4
Pats Pets Corporation

Animal rescue

Animals
5
Paws - Preservation of Animal Welfare & Safety Inc

The organization is a no-kill animal rescue. paws saves lives and prevents suffering by implementing the no-kill philosophy through aggressive spay/neuter programs for owned and unowned animals. this is accomplished by rescuing, fostering,…

Animals
6
Animal Rescue Alliance Inc

To rescue homeless animals, provide them with the best medical care and nuturing environment while working to find them a forever home.

—
7
Pet Stop Rescue

Pet stop rescue engages in the rescue and adoption of abandonded and abused animals, assists with the spaying and neutering of dogs and cats and provides assistance with veterinarian services and supplies for these activities.

Animals
8
Furever Family Animal Rescue

Helping abandoned neglected and distressed animals

Animals
9
Big Bones Canine Rescue Services Inc

Rescue and rehoming of large domestic dogs

Animals
10
Canine Companions Rescue

Animal dog rescue group

Animals
11
All About Animals Rescue Inc

Animal rescue and adoption.

Animals
12
Rover Rescue Inc

Rescue dogs and puppies from high kill shelters

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Animal Rescue; the most unlike its peers is Westmoreland County Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCHQUEEN OF ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherQUEEN OF ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOLPEYTONS K9S: $7,000 · OtherGREENSBURG VFD DIVE TEAM: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $13,000 · Other+9 moreGRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $4,821 · AnimalsGRAY PAWS …ALL BUT FURGOTTEN INC: $3,000 · AnimalsALL BUT FU…NO DOG LEFT BEHIND INC: $2,500 · AnimalsNO DOG LEF…PET FRIENDS INC: $2,000 · AnimalsPET FRIEND…PENNSYLVANIA STATE ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM: $2,000 · AnimalsPENNSYLVAN…HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 · AnimalsPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$135,000Animals$14,821Health$12,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAY PAWS SANCTUARY: $4,821 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetALL BUT FURGOTTEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNO DOG LEFT BEHIND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET FRIENDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA STATE ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAY PAWS SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds ALL BUT FURGOTTEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NO DOG LEFT BEHIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PET FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA STATE ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Free Yourself Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Free Yourself Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Free Yourself’s filings →

    More from the funding graph