Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frederick Bornman Trust for Conservative

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$66kArts & Culture$63kEducation$63kCrime & Legal$61kInternational$53kCivil Rights$53kSocial Science$12kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $52k
$10,447
Median grant
5
States reached
$206k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA$10,447
ACCURACY IN MEDIA$10,447
AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL FOUNDATION$10,447
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,447
EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$10,447
AMERICAS FUTURE INC$5,235
HANOVER REVIEW INC$5,212
EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,212
THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI$5,212
AMERICAS FUTURE FOUNDATION$5,212
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $10k → 11%THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI: $5k → 16%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $7k → 12%AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL FUND: $7k → 8%HANOVER REVIEW INC: $5k → 10%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $8k → 11%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $7k → 12%AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL: $7k → 8%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $7k → 11%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $5k → 12%AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL: $5k → 8%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $7k → 11%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $5k → 12%AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5k → 8%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $7k → 11%EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $5k → 12%AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5k → 8%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $7k → 11%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $5k → 11%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $5k → 11%EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $5k → 11%AMERICAS FUTURE INC: $5k → 11%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $10k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $10k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $10k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $7k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $7k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $7k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $7k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $7k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $7k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $5k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $5k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $5k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $5k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $5k → 14%ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA: $5k → 14%ACCURACY IN MEDIA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
IN
PA
MO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$360k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
0%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +63%
  • AI
    ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +375%
  • AF
    AMERICAS FUTURE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue ×42

Funded once

  • AF
    America's Future Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue +81%
  • TE
    THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
  • HR
    HANOVER REVIEW INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Spectator Foundation Inc

The American Spectator Foundation is a non-profit, non-partisan media organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator. Through its editorial programs, The American Spectator strives to educate the public on new ideas,…

Education
2
The American Antitrust Institute Inc

Promote competition that protects consumers, businesses, and society.

Social Science
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
American Affairs Foundation Inc

To publish a periodical in online, digital, print, and/or other formats, available to a general audience, with original scholarly content matters of educational, literacy, and civil importance: to support and promote the conduct and…

Arts & Culture
5
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
6
American Media Institute

Inform the public by providing news

—
7
American Action Forum Inc

Aaf is dedicated to broad public education on domestic and economic issues, using modern communication tools to engage the public and propose policy solutions. it engages in policy research based on data and provides commentary on domestic…

Social Science
8
Media Freedom Foundation

Public education on contemporary social issues and protection of the 1st amendment of the U.S. constitution.

Recreation & Sports
9
National Affairs Inc

Aspires to help Americans think a little more clearly about the challenges of governing ourselves. To publish essays about public policy, society, culture, politics and the world of ideas, with an eye to what a responsible and thoughtful…

—
10
Association for the New Century Inc

The Association for the New Century Inc aims to contribute to public awareness of a range of economic and international relations issues while contributing to public debate about national strategy.

—
11
Center for the National Interest

The center is a non-partisan public policy institution established by former president richard nixon. its current programs focus on energy, security, climate change and u.s. relations with china, japan, russia and the middle east.

Public Benefit
12
Foundation for American Security and Freedom Inc

To inform and educate the American public on issues of national security and advocate for a strong national foreign policy that best serves the interests of the United States.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hanover Review Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $60,594 · OtherEAGLE FORUM & LEGAL DEFENSE FUNDAMERICAS FUTURE INC: $52,647 · OtherAMERICAS FUTURE INCAMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL FUND: $17,920 · OtherAMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL FUNDAMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL: $17,257 · OtherAMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATIONALLINCOLN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC: $12,300 · OtherLINCOLN INSTITUTE OF PUBLICCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $15,636 · Other+3 moreACCURACY IN ACADEMIA INC: $63,094 · Arts & CultureACCURACY IN ACADEMIA INCACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $58,094 · Arts & CultureACCURACY IN MEDIA INCTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $60,594 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUN…AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $17,682 · InternationalAmerica's Future Foundation: $5,212 · Youth Development
Other$186,354Arts & Culture$121,188Public Benefit$60,594International$17,682Youth Development$5,212

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACCURACY IN ACADEMIA INC: $63,094 over 9y, 20% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $60,594 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetACCURACY IN MEDIA INC: $58,094 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAS FUTURE INC: $52,647 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetAMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $17,682 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetCANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHANOVER REVIEW INC: $5,212 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACCURACY IN ACADEMIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCURACY IN MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds America's Future Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER REVIEW INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION & RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frederick Bornman Trust for Conservative funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frederick Bornman Trust for Conservative. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frederick Bornman Trust for Conservative’s filings →

    More from the funding graph