Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fred Schelben Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of FRED SCHELBEN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$800
Median grant
2
States reached
$225k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$2,250
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON$2,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC$1,000
HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$850
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$850
DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM$800
AMERICAN RED CROSS$600
DELTA COTTON BELLES$450
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$250
DELTA CENTER STAGE$250
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$150
MISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 29%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 29%COMMUNITY COUNSELING SERVICE: $1k → 22%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO: $2k → 27%THE SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 27%UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 27%GREATER GREENVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $950 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $900 → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $850 → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $850 → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $850 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $825 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $800 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%OUR HOUSE INC: $740 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $700 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 27%DELTA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $660 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 27%DELTA CENTER STAGE: $600 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 27%DELTA COTTON BELLES: $500 → 27%DELTA COTTON BELLES: $500 → 27%DELTA COTTON BELLES: $500 → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$85k · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
16

Total granted

$85k
$10k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +81%
  • DC
    DELTA COTTON BELLES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +74%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • GG
    GREATER GREENVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
2
Delta Compass

The mission of the Washington County Work Ready Association is to promote, support, and provide innovative programs that provide workforce development skill training for high demand and high growth industry sectors to residents of…

Employment
3
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
4
Washington Community Theatre

Provide a low cost theatre options for the community of washington

Arts & Culture
5
Walker Area Community Center

Providing healthy activities in a supporting environment for youth, families and the community.

Human Services
6
Boys & Girls Club of Jefferson County

Provide a safe place for youth to go for recreational and educational programs.

Youth Development
7
Boys and Girls Club of Dawson County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens

8
Boys and Girls Club of Kingsville Inc

Program serves to develop boys and girls in kingsville.

9
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
10
Boys and Girls Club of Southeast Missouri Inc

Provided a safe place for area youth to use as a recreational facility and to conduct educational reinforcement classes for "at risk" youth

Youth Development
11
Hope Center Dc Inc

Restoring hope through the message of the gospel, and restoring community through the power of relationships

Religion
12
Bethesda Christian Counseling Midwest Inc

Outpatient mental health in a Christian atmosphere.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Washington County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Delta Center Stage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $15,450 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTYHodding Carter Memorial YMCA — $8,560 · OtherHodding Carter Memorial YMCATHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC — $7,050 · OtherTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INCCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC — $6,670 · OtherCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $6,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM — $5,800 · OtherDELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUMAMERICAN RED CROSS — $5,525 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSDELTA CENTER STAGE INC — $2,750 · Other+20 more — $14,189 · Other+20 moreUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $17,795 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WASHING…DELTA COTTON BELLES INC — $3,300 · HealthOUR HOUSE INC — $1,390 · Crime & Legal
Other$72,044Philanthropy$17,795Health$3,300Crime & Legal$1,390

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $17,795 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $15,450 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetHodding Carter Memorial YMCA — $8,560 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC — $6,670 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetDELTA COTTON BELLES INC — $3,300 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDELTA CENTER STAGE INC — $2,750 over 8y, 12% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC — $1,390 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC — $700 over 7y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
  • Who funds Hodding Carter Memorial YMCA
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC
  • Who funds DELTA COTTON BELLES INC
  • Who funds DELTA CENTER STAGE INC
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Straddlefork FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Straddlefork Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred Schelben Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred Schelben Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred Schelben Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph