Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred Schelben Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$18kYouth Development$17kHealth$16kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$10kEducation$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$2,300
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON$2,000
DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM$1,200
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC$1,000
HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$600
DELTA COTTON BELLES$500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$300
MISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 26%, against an area that typically sits at 29%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 29%COMMUNITY COUNSELING SERVICE: $1k → 22%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO: $2k → 27%THE SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 27%UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $2k → 27%GREATER GREENVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $1k → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $1k → 27%EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $950 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $900 → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $850 → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $850 → 27%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $850 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $825 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $800 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $800 → 27%OUR HOUSE INC: $740 → 27%DELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $700 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 27%DELTA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $660 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 27%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
16

Total granted

$96k
$10k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
PhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
    8× · 2019–2026 · $17k · revenue +81%
  • DC
    DELTA COTTON BELLES INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $4k · revenue +74%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF WASHINGTON CO
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • GG
    GREATER GREENVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Community Theatre

Provide a low cost theatre options for the community of washington

Arts & Culture
2
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
3
Delta Compass

The missions of the washington county work ready association is to promote, support, and provide innovative programs that provide workforce development skill training for high demand and high growth industry sectors to residents of…

Employment
4
Boys & Girls Club of Darlington Inc

Provides youth guidance through recreational and other activities designed to keep children out of trouble.

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Club of Washington County Inc

Provide behavioral guidance and promote health, social, educational and vocational development of boys and girls six to eighteen years of age.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
7
The Boys and Girls Club of Washington Co

The bgcwc provides programming to more than 550 youth annually, grades k thru 12, in the areas of character, leadership, social and physical recreation, and performing better in school.

Youth Development
8
Boys and Girls Club of Dawson County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens

—
9
Young Womens Christian Association

Domestic violence response and prevention - the ywca of kitsap county is dedicated to ensuring the personal safety, rights, welfare, and dignity of those who experience domestic abuse while building partnerships and increasing community…

—
10
Boys and Girls Club of Green Countr

To provide young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens by offering a variety of fun and learning based programs.

Youth Development
11
Delta Childrens Advocacy Center

Delta Childrens Advocacy Centers mission is to respond to child abuse in the Mississippi Delta by serving and nurturing children and non-offending caregivers through a trauma-informed multidisciplinary approach.

Crime & Legal
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Washington County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mississippi Kidney Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $17,450 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTYHodding Carter Memorial YMCA: $9,560 · OtherHodding Carter Memorial YMCATHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $8,050 · OtherTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INCCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,770 · OtherCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $7,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUM: $7,000 · OtherDELTA'S CHILDREN MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $6,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDELTA CENTER STAGE INC: $2,750 · Other+20 more: $14,589 · Other+20 moreUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $20,095 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WASHING…DELTA COTTON BELLES INC: $3,800 · HealthOUR HOUSE INC: $1,390 · Crime & Legal
Other$80,344Philanthropy$20,095Health$3,800Crime & Legal$1,390

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $20,095 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $17,450 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetHodding Carter Memorial YMCA: $9,560 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,770 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDELTA COTTON BELLES INC: $3,800 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDELTA CENTER STAGE INC: $2,750 over 8y, 12% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $1,390 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Hodding Carter Memorial YMCA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA COTTON BELLES INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA CENTER STAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI KIDNEY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Straddlefork FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Straddlefork Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred Schelben Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred Schelben Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred Schelben Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred Schelben Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred Schelben’s filings →

    More from the funding graph