Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fred Beans Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Human Services$330kFood & Nutrition$90kEducation$80kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$50k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATHLETES HELPING ATHLETES INC$50,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUCKS COUNTY INCORPORA$50,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL BUCKS COUNTY$50,000
ALPHA BRAVO CANINE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BUCKS FOR KIDS: $40k → 6%SALUTE2SERVICE INC: $100k → 6%ALPHA BRAVO CANINE: $50k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dinners for Veterans Inc

Serving all veterans in need any time

Public Benefit
2
Vettes for Vets (Vettes-4-Vets)

Assistance to Veterans, Military personnel and/or their families

Philanthropy
3
Veterans Non Profit

Provide services to veterans

4
Veterans Rock

Veterans charity

Human Services
5
Support Our Soldiers

Provide financial support for veterans.

Human Services
6
Helping Ohio Heroes

Providing veteran's children with scholarships.

7
Home for Dinner Incorporated

Assist local veterans

Human Services
8
Sentinels of Freedom of Western Pa

Part iii to provide for the well being of severly injuried veterans of the armed forces returning to civilian life. such veterans will receive housing, transportation, employment and mentorship for 4 years.

Housing & Shelter
9
Coles County Veterans Support Coalition

To provide support to the local veteran community

Public Benefit
10
Help for the Homeless Inc

We provide goods and services to homeless veterans and homeless or at risk youth. We host other activities and provided needed items to veterans and other youth as needed.

Human Services
11
Baden K9 Kares Foundation Inc

to assist veterans in obtaining service animals

Human Services
12
Spartan Paws 4 Warriors

Service dogs for disabled veterans

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salute 2 Service and the most unlike its peers is Alpha Bravo Canine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALUTE 2 SERVICE — $100,000 · Human ServicesSALUTE 2 SERVICEALPHA BRAVO CANINE — $50,000 · Human ServicesALPHA BRAVO CANINEBUCKS FOR KIDS — $40,000 · Human ServicesBUCKS FOR KIDSVeterans Multi-Service Center Inc — $100,000 · Public BenefitVeterans Multi-Ser…MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL BUCKS CO — $50,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS O…CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $40,000 · Food & NutritionCHESTER COUNTY FO…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BUCKS COUNTY INCORPORA — $50,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG …A WOMAN'S PLACE — $40,000 · OtherA WOMAN'S PLACEBUCKS COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $40,000 · EducationBUCKS COUNTY IN…BUCKS COUNTY HEROES SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $40,000 · EducationBUCKS COUNTY HE…Atheletes Helping Atheletes Inc — $50,000 · PhilanthropyAtheletes…
Human Services$190,000Public Benefit$100,000Food & Nutrition$90,000Other$90,000Education$80,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVeterans Multi-Service Center Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSALUTE 2 SERVICE — $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL BUCKS CO — $50,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetAtheletes Helping Atheletes Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetALPHA BRAVO CANINE — $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE — $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUCKS FOR KIDS — $40,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY HEROES SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $40,000 over 1y, 23% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred Beans Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred Beans Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred Beans Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph