Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fraserhugh A

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$439kEducation$146kPhilanthropy$95kHuman Services$82kFood & Nutrition$38kHealth$34kReligion$32kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $73k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS$20,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY TUSCARAWAS$12,500
OHIO GUIDESTONE$10,000
TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$10,000
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$10,000
WELTY MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,100
DOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,000
LIFEWAY CHURCH$5,105
FRIENDS OF THE HOMELESS OF TUSC CNTY$5,000
OHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY COUNCIL FOR CHURCH &$3,000
NEWCOMERSTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,905
Individual grant recipient$713
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $13k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $10k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 26 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$775k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+21%

Still filing today

15%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $356k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TUSCARAWAS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $59k
  • PF
    PERSONAL & FAMILY COUNSELING
    6× · 2017–2022 · $57k

Funded once

  • TC
    TUSCARAWAS COUNTY YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Tuscarawas County Inc

The mission of the united way of tuscarawascounty inc is to invest in local programs and services thateffectively improve the lives of tuscarawas county residents.

Philanthropy
2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
3
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Bucks County

United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.

Philanthropy
6
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
7
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
8
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

—
9
Access Tusc

Will actively collaborate, educate, and coordinate social and health services of tuscarawas and surrounding counties to establish effective relationships to improve access and integrated care for the communities

Health
10
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
11
Tioga United Way Inc

Efficiently allocate and organize donations to local charitable organizations.

Philanthropy
12
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is OhioGuidestone; the most unlike its peers is Tuscarawas Arts Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS: $356,120 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERSUNITED WAY OF TUSCARAWAS: $58,656 · OtherUNITED WAY OF TUSCARAWASPERSONAL & FAMILY COUNSELING: $57,275 · OtherPERSONAL & FAMILY COUNSELINGDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL: $44,410 · OtherDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL+43 more: $270,651 · Other+43 moreOhioGuidestone: $26,500 · HealthOHIO'S HOSPICE INC: $2,500 · HealthBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $27,670 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $26,000 · PhilanthropyTUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTUSCARAWAS ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $13,250 · Arts & CultureBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$787,112Health$29,000Human Services$27,670Philanthropy$26,000Education$15,000Arts & Culture$13,250Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $27,670 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOhioGuidestone: $26,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTUSCARAWAS ARTS PARTNERSHIP: $13,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSTARLIGHT ENTERPRISES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOHIO'S HOSPICE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds TUSCARAWAS COUNTY UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUSCARAWAS ARTS PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds TUSCORA PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STARLIGHT ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO DISTRICT KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO'S HOSPICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reeves FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reeves Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fraserhugh A funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fraserhugh A. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fraserhugh A’s filings →

    More from the funding graph