Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Frankenberg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$223kYouth Development$175kFood & Nutrition$70kHealth$55kArts & Culture$50kPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANCHO CIELO$50,000
VACAVILLE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$25,000
EQUIPMENT JUNCTION INC$25,000
WESTMINSTER COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK: $20k → 9%FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $20k → 9%VACAVILLE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25k → 10%SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ALLIANCE FOR SMILES: $25k → 10%FAMILY MEAL SACRAMENTO REGION: $10k → 12%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ CO: $10k → 13%SUNDANCE INSTITUTE: $50k → 5%WGU ADVANCEMENT: $103k → 8%STEM FUTURE FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%ACCMA: $10k → 10%SSVMS: $10k → 12%EQUIPMENT JUNCTION INC: $25k → 13%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $30k → 8%ACCMA: $10k → 10%EQUIPMENT JUNCTION INC: $15k → 13%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $20k → 8%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $10k → 8%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $10k → 8%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$270k · 3 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$270k
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-30%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RANCHO CIELO INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue -2%
  • WU
    WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue -30%
  • EJ
    EQUIPMENT JUNCTION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue -95% · 94% of their budget

Funded once

  • WA
    WGU Advancement
    one grant, 2022 · $103k · revenue 0%
  • Sundance Institute
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +1%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR SMILES
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
5
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

6
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
11
Cal State East Bay Educational Foundation

To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…

Education
12
Western Governors University

Wgu's mission is to change lives for the better by creating pathways to opportunity. wgu does this by operating and administering an institution of higher education and learning.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rancho Cielo Inc and the most unlike its peers is Equipment Junction Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WGU Advancement — $102,500 · OtherWGU AdvancementALLIANCE FOR SMILES — $25,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR SMILESNAPA VALLEY FOOD BANK — $20,000 · OtherNAPA VALLEY FOOD BANKACCMA — $20,000 · OtherACCMASTEM FUTURE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherSTEM FUTURE FOUNDATIONSSVMS — $10,000 · OtherFAMILY MEAL SACRAMENTO REGION — $10,000 · OtherSUTTER BAY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherRANCHO CIELO INC — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO INCTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS &…WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITYEQUIPMENT JUNCTION INC — $40,000 · EducationEQUIPMENT JUNCTION INCSundance Institute — $50,332 · Arts & CultureSundance …FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$212,500Youth Development$175,000Education$120,000Arts & Culture$50,332Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRANCHO CIELO INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWGU Advancement — $102,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSundance Institute — $50,332 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUIPMENT JUNCTION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Frankenberg Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph