How much does Frank Family Charity Fund Inc give?

Frank Family Charity Fund Inc reported 39 grants totaling $353,473 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 34 and 45 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.

What does Frank Family Charity Fund Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (36%), Health (4%), Philanthropy (2%).

Who are Frank Family Charity Fund Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: East Hill Synagogue ($99k), Chai Lifeline Inc ($42k), Hebron Fund Inc ($20k).

Does Frank Family Charity Fund Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Frank Family Charity Fund Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Frank Family Charity Fund Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Fjc, The Blumenfeld Family Foundation.

Where is Frank Family Charity Fund Inc based?

Frank Family Charity Fund Inc is based in NJ.

Frank Family Charity Fund Inc

Frank Family Charity Fund Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Frank Family Charity Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$353k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$167k

Largest

01What it funds

0164% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$547kHealth$56kPhilanthropy$24kInternational$18kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$4kScience & Tech$2kYouth Development$2kOther$0

02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k33 grants · $63k
$10k–50k4 grants · $69k
$50k–250k2 grants · $222k

$1,800

Median grant

States reached

$1.2M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CHABAD	$167,160
AFYTY	$55,000
SHALVA	$23,000
SAR	$20,500
EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE	$14,650
CHAI LIFE LINE	$10,360
HATZALAH OF CHICAGO	$5,000
ORTHODOX COUNCIL OF JERUSALEM	$5,000
MORIAH	$4,780
TIKVA	$4,500
HEBRON FUND	$3,600
Individual grant recipient	$3,500
CBY	$3,384
THE SHUL	$2,980
Individual grant recipient	$2,936

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.4M · 43 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+113%

Still filing today

28%

16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionEducationOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CL
CHAI LIFELINE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +43%
HF
HEBRON FUND INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +60%
JO
JUST ONE LIFE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +37%

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2023 · $18k
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC
one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -49%
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2023 · $5k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Sherit Isroel

—

Idf Memorial Foundation

Philanthropy

Tal Hashamayim Foundation

Religion

Israel Select Charity Fund Inc

Helping individuals and organizations with great needs and little resources and with often few options.

Human Services

The Keren Rachaim Fund

—

Ohel Yakov Foundation

—

Israel Charitable Foundation Inc

Philanthropy

Israel Medical Fund Corp

To provide guidance and support to families with ill or physically disabled family members

Human Services

Tzemach Yifroch Foundation

—

Yad Yosef Foundation

Philanthropy

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Noahs Arc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/24

Grantees still filing

16/24

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,395,848Health$51,900International$26,100Philanthropy$21,100Human Services$3,400Religion$2,640Arts & Culture$1,710Education$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY28.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · The Setton Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Sarna Family Charitable Foundation · The Lee and Cheryl Lasher Family Foundation Inc · The Mermelstein Foundation · Cherna Moskowitz Foundation · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Stephen and Regina Savitsky Foundation · George and Ellen Friedman Family Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank Family Charity Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank Family Charity Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Frank Family Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home