Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank & Vera Ferola Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$450kEducation$390kHealth$16kHuman Services$2kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$106k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN PAUL II ACADEMY$40,360
DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH LUMEN CHRISTI GALA$25,000
ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,300
DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH SERVICES APPEAL$5,000
OPERATION SMILE$500
BOYS TOWN$300
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$300
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$300
FURRY FRIENDS HUMANE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $150 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$841k · 12 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$841k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-2%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
    3× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +78%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +19%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL REGIONAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • BC
    BROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -2%
  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
2
Baptist Health Medical Group Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist health medical group inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist…

Health
3
Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist hospital of miami is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
4
Doctors Hospital Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of doctors hospital, inc. is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Baptist Outpatient Services Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist outpatient services is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is…

Health
7
South Miami Hospital Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of south miami hospital is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
8
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas

The mission of Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas is to perform sacred work by uniting kindness, quality, and healing through the provision of health care services to the community.

Health
9
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
10
Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist health south florida foundation, inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve.…

Health
11
Miami Cancer Institute At Baptist Health Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of miami cancer institute at baptist health, inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve.…

Health
12
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN PAUL II ACADEMY: $291,690 · OtherST JOHN PAUL II ACADEMYDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH LUMEN CHRISTI GALA: $200,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH LUMEN CHRISTI GALAST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $189,480 · OtherST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCHPOPE JOHN PAUL II HIGH SCHOOL INC: $97,385 · OtherPOPE JOHN PAUL II HIGH SCHOOL INCDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH SERVICES APPEAL: $45,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF PALM BEACH SERVICES APPEAL+6 more: $19,370 · OtherBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $11,000 · HealthBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $1,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION SMILE INC: $740 · InternationalPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $250 · AnimalsFurry Friends Humane Inc: $250 · Animals
Other$842,925Health$13,500Human Services$2,350International$740Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $740 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
  • Who funds Furry Friends Humane Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank & Vera Ferola Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank & Vera Ferola Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Broward Childrens Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank & Vera Ferola’s filings →

More from the funding graph