How much did FRANCIS J AND EDITH JACKSON FOUNDA grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of FRANCIS J AND EDITH JACKSON FOUNDA’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

mountaineer

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

resource

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k18 grants · $79k
$10k–50k6 grants · $79k

$6,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION$15,000
WVNCC FOUNDATION INC$15,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$12,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA$12,000
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC$10,000
SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELIN$8,000
WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT$8,000
HOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - FOOD$8,000
SALVATION ARMY WHEELING$6,000
FAMILY SERVICES UPPER OHIO VALLEY$6,000
NORTH WHEELING COMM YOUTH CENTER$6,000
FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS$5,000
APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC$5,000
ST JAMES EVANGELICAL LUTHERN CHURC$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $267k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 16%. 24% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$994k · 31 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$994k

$14k

Still filing today

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WL
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $99k · revenue +125%
YS
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $77k · revenue +28%
HO
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $62k · revenue +33%

Funded once

TC
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY AMAZING RAISE LOCAL INCENTITIV
one grant, 2018 · $5k
MA
MOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECT
one grant, 2018 · $2k
BL
BUCKEYE LOCAL SCHOOLS
one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

West Virginia Health Right Inc

To provide medical, dental, pharmaceutical, behavioral health, vision and health education service to the uninsured and underinsured poor of west virginia. wv health right also operates a charitable mail order pharmacy for west virginia…

—

Wayne County Community Services

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement

Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services

Meals On Wheels of Jefferson County Inc

Provide meals to home bound citizensof jefferson county, wv

—

Wiliamsburg Area Meals On Wheels

Deliver hot meals in williamsburg va area to aged, convalescent, and handicapped individuals who are unable to prepare nutritious meals for themselves.

—

West Side Catholic Center

The west side catholic center provides food, clothing, shelter, and advocacy to all who come to us in need. through various programs, we serve the homeless and indigent of cleveland, ohio.

Human Services

Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

Care of terminally ill patients.

—

The Open Shelter Inc

Provide support services to homeless individuals and help reintegrate them back into society.

Housing & Shelter

Louisville Wheels Transportation

Louisville wheels transportation, inc. exists to serve as a resource for elderly and disabled people, providing transportation to medical appointments, senior centers, and other similar needs of its clients.

Human Services

Meals On Wheels of Chester County

To provide nutritious meals and personal interaction to homebound adults living in chester county to help them live independently in their own homes.

Human Services

Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virginia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter

Health Access Inc

Charitable free clinic that provides primary medical care and prescription medications to uninsured, low income adults in a two county area of north central, wv

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc and the most unlike its peers is Life Hub Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

11/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$595,600Human Services$266,900Education$102,000Health$26,100Food & Nutrition$17,250Philanthropy$2,500Employment$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert Schenk III & Kathleen HWV24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Vna Home Support Services Inc · Helping Hand Foundation · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · The Health Plan of West Virginia Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Robinson S Parlin Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FRANCIS J AND EDITH JACKSON FOUNDA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 341972605 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda?

Find your warmest path to Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FRANCIS J AND EDITH JACKSON FOUNDA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda?

More from the funding graph

FRANCIS J AND EDITH JACKSON FOUNDA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda?

More from the funding graph