Skip to content
Fox Harbor Family Foundation Corp at a glance

· Private foundation

Fox Harbor Family Foundation Corp

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$25kHealth$13kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Benefit$3kAnimals$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$237k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLASSIC CAR MUSEUM OF ST MICHAELS$25,000
BURLINGTON EDISON ALUMNI FOUNDATION$5,000
BRIAN DAGLE FOUNDATION$4,500
CATHEDRAL DISTRICT JAX$4,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$3,000
WARRIORS FOR WARRIORS$2,500
DESC$2,500
GRACIE'S KITCHEN$2,500
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIORS$1,500
ST JOSEPH INDIAN SCHOOL$1,500
HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$1,500
K9'S FOR WARRIORS$1,500
TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRACIE'S KITCHEN: $3k → 7%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $2k → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
SD
CT
CO
KY
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Cancer Foundation

To assist uninsured and underinsured patients.

Unclassified
2
Folds of Honor Foundation

Folds of Honor, Georgia Chapter, provides the national organization with grant funds that provide recipients with higher education scholarships and children's fund scholarships for spouses and dependents for service members who were killed…

—
3
Coastal Educational Foundation

To provide support to coastal carolina university through charitable donations received primarily from individual donors.

—
4
Hospice Help Foundation

Hospice help foundation provides financial assistance to hospice patients and their families in an effort to meet their emotional & financial needs at the end of life.

Health
5
Hal Warlick Scholarship Fund

Scholarships for low income students attending various colleges including Furman, Anderson, CofC, Winthrop, USC Columbia, Hollins, USC-Upstate, etc

Education
6
Faith C Ai Memorial Scholarship Fund Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
7
Kevin Cain Memorial Foundation

Help cancer victims defray expenses

Philanthropy
8
Georgia Bright Futures Foundation Inc

Scholarships and Tuition Grants

—
9
Warrior Kids Foundation
Health
10
Caroline Hospice Foundation Inc

Provide palliative and supportive care for patients and their families living with a terminal illness during illness and the dying process.

—
11
Carolina Caring Inc

To provide high quality, compassionate care to terminally ill individuals and their families

Human Services
12
Cancer Foundation of the Florida Keys Inc

To offer education, support and everyday living expenses for needy cancer patients of monroe county, fl.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Appalachian Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Warriors for Warriors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLASSIC CAR MUSEUM OF ST MICHAELS: $25,000 · OtherCLASSIC CAR MUSEUM OF ST MICHAELSDESC: $2,500 · OtherDESCST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $1,500 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS: $1,500 · OtherHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 · OtherThe Brian Dagle Foundation Inc: $9,500 · HealthThe Brian Dagle F…BURLINGTON-EDISON ALUMNI FOUNDATION DOLLARS FOR SC: $5,000 · EducationBURLINGTON-EDI…AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIA…CATHEDRAL DISTRICT-JAX INC: $4,000 · Community ImprovementGRACIES KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesWARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,500 · Public BenefitK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,500 · AnimalsTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$32,000Health$9,500Education$8,000Community Improvement$4,000Human Services$4,000Public Benefit$2,500Animals$1,500Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Brian Dagle Foundation Inc: $9,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBURLINGTON-EDISON ALUMNI FOUNDATION DOLLARS FOR SC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCATHEDRAL DISTRICT-JAX INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACIES KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fox Harbor Family Foundation Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fox Harbor Family Foundation Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fox Harbor Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home