Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel

The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel was formed for the purpose of educating the public and the legal community on current litigation issues and supporting the integrity of the legal system by providing forums for discussion on topics critical to the legal system.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$320kInternational$63kSocial Science$5kOther$43k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $60,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $124,994 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,994 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
iCivics Inc$25,000
National Foundation for Judicial Excellence$20,000
National High School Mock Trial$7,500
Peace Development Fund$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%National High School Mock Trial Championship Inc: $10k → 10%Peace Development Fund: $8k → 12%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%National Foundation for Judicial Excellence: $20k → 14%National High School Mock Trial Championship Inc: $10k → 10%Peace Development Fund: $8k → 12%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%National Foundation for Judicial Excellence: $20k → 14%National High School Mock Trial: $8k → 10%Peace Development Fund: $8k → 12%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%National Foundation for Judicial Excellence: $20k → 14%National High School Mock Trial: $8k → 10%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%National Foundation for Judicial Excellence: $20k → 14%National High School Mock Trial: $8k → 10%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%National Foundation for Judicial Excellence: $20k → 14%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%National Foundation for Judicial Excellence: $20k → 14%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%Diverse Attorney Pipeline Program: $5k → 14%iCivics Inc: $25k → 14%United Nations Foundation Inc: $20k → 14%United Nations Foundation Inc: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $60k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$35k · 58% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: General Support

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$25k · 42% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: General Support

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ICIVICS INC — $200,000 · EducationICIVICS INCNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLE — $120,000 · EducationNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLEUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS F…Peace Development Fund — $22,500 · InternationalPeace Developmen…NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL CHAMPIONSHIP INC — $42,500 · OtherNATIONAL HI…THE DIVERSE ATTORNEY PIPELINE PROGRAM NFP — $5,000 · Social Science
Education$320,000International$62,500Other$42,500Social Science$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetICIVICS INC — $200,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLE — $120,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPeace Development Fund — $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DIVERSE ATTORNEY PIPELINE PROGRAM NFP — $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ICIVICS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLE
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Peace Development Fund
  • Who funds THE DIVERSE ATTORNEY PIPELINE PROGRAM NFP

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Icivics Inc13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel?

Find your warmest path to Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph