Skip to content
Foundation for Smfm at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Foundation for Smfm

The FOUNDATION FOR SMFM is a 501(c)(3) non-profit created to promote the career development of young investigators whose research will advance the field of maternal-fetal medicine (mfm) and improve the care of individuals with high-risk pregnancies.

$348k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MEducation$970kScience & Tech$135k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $310,731, the rows itemized in this filing. The $347,526 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,795 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $255k
$60,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$75,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$60,000
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$60,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$60,000
SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE$40,731
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $75k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON: $60k → 16%SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $21k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $60k → 13%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $64k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $70k → 21%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $15k → 17%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $75k → 12%YALE UNIVERSITY: $120k → 12%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $60k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $15k → 9%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY CENTER: $20k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE: $56k → 19%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60k → 22%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 14%SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $60k → 13%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $60k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $60k → 21%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $60k → 11%ICH HEALTH SERVICES: $20k → 9%THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF RESEARCH SERVICES: $60k → 22%REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $60k → 13%THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF RESEARCH SERVICES: $60k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
WI
MI
MA
OR
NV
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$756k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$741k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+41%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +51%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $180k · revenue +26%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $130k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • TM
    Tufts Medical Center Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is International Community Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $195,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $180,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $130,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYYale University: $120,000 · EducationYale UniversityUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $120,000 · EducationUniversity of South Florida Foundation IncOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+5 more: $75,000 · Education+5 moreREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $124,110 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CE…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $75,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTufts Medical Center Inc: $75,000 · OtherTufts Medical Center IncMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $75,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $60,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $55,890 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $30,000 · Other+2 more: $35,000 · OtherCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $180,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL …CLINICAL CARE ASSOCIATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $120,000 · HealthCLINICAL CARE ASSOCIA…SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $71,061 · HealthSOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-…INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $20,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15,000 · HealthNorthwestern University: $75,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$970,000Other$710,000Health$406,061Recreation & Sports$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $195,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $180,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $180,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICAL CARE ASSOCIATES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $120,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE: $71,061 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Smfm funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Smfm. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Smfm’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home