Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for Hearing and Speech Resources

Raise funds to support programs which assure that individuals with hearing and communication disorders have the opportunity to develop to their full potential, enjoy the same social and educational opportunities as their peers, and lead healthy and fulfilling lives.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$411kArts & Culture$208kHousing & Shelter$60kEducation$1kOther$36k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $147,732 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $167,168 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,436 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$21,359
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$70,471
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$30,000
MUSIC MAKERS OF WESTERN SPRINGS$21,359
OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC$9,002
ENCORE MUSIC ACADEMY$8,900
SCOPE CLINIC RUSH HOSPITAL SYSTEMS$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ENCORE MUSIC ACADEMY: $9k → 6%THE CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY: $15k → 14%THE CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY: $12k → 14%THE CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY: $10k → 14%THE CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY: $8k → 14%THE CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY: $8k → 14%MUSIC MAKERS OF WESTERN SPRINGS: $21k → 14%THE CHICAGO HEARING SOCIETY: $6k → 14%SCOPE CLINIC RUSH HOSPITAL SYSTEMS: $8k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO: $8k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY IF ILLINOIS CHICAGO: $2k → 14%OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC: $9k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $142k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $93k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $34k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $30k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $30k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $24k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $23k → 14%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO COMER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO COMER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $70k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $50k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $45k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $25k → 14%ADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%ADVOCATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$665k · 5 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$665k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+52%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2024 · $386k · revenue +60%
  • MS
    MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $190k · revenue +36%
  • LA
    LESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER
    6× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO COMER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • University of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
2
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
3
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
4
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
5
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
8
Swedish Covenant Health

Swedish Covenant Health follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

9
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
10
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
11
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
12
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Community Music Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $385,636 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $17,500 · Health+1 more — $8,000 · HealthMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $189,891 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSICOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC — $9,002 · Arts & CultureNorthwest Community Music Academy — $8,900 · Arts & CultureLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER — $59,750 · Housing & ShelterLESTER AN…MUSIC MAKERS OF WESTERN SPRINGS — $21,359 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $12,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO COMER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $1,500 · OtherUniversity of Chicago — $1,000 · Education
Health$411,136Arts & Culture$207,793Housing & Shelter$59,750Other$35,559Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $385,636 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $189,891 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLESTER AND ROSALIE ANIXTER CENTER — $59,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC — $9,002 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Community Music Academy — $8,900 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Hearing and Speech Resources funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph