Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution C/O Sterling Foundation LLC

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$200kCrime & Legal$59kInternational$36kEmployment$15kHealth$15kCommunity Improvement$5kReligion$2k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USF FOUNDATION INC$50,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$32,000
THE CHARLES WIDGER SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$25,000
REBUILDING UKRAINE ASSOCIATION INC$25,000
PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC$5,000
XAVERIAN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CHARLES WIDGER SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5k → 7%PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $8k → 8%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%UC HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW: $1k → 10%INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW: $3k → 14%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $1k → 17%XAVERIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 20%STETSON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%REBUILDING UKRAINE ASSOCIATION INC: $25k → 13%NATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 8%THE CHARLES WIDGET SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $5k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1k → 10%UC HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW: $1k → 10%INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW: $1k → 14%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $1k → 17%XAVERIAN: $5k → 20%FLORIDA NEXT FOUNDATION INC DBA SYNAPSE: $5k → 13%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10k → 7%PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $1k → 8%UC BERKELEY HAAS BUSINESS SCHOOL: $1k → 10%UC HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW: $500 → 10%INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW: $1k → 14%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $500 → 17%BESS THE BOOK BUS INC: $3k → 13%PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $1k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1k → 10%UC HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW: $100 → 10%INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $400 → 11%UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW: $100 → 14%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $100 → 17%BAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES: $1k → 13%PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT: $500 → 8%UC BERKELEY HAAS BUSINESS SCHOOL: $1k → 10%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%USF FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $100 → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $500 → 10%USF FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 13%UC BERKELEY HAAS BUSINESS SCHOOL: $500 → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $100 → 10%UC BERKELEY HAAS BUSINESS SCHOOL: $100 → 10%WESTERN DOMINICAN PROVINCE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution C/O Sterling Foundation LLC’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution C/O Sterling Foundation LLClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 6 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$88k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-9%

Still filing today

33%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationEmploymentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of South Florida Foundation Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $60k · revenue +32%
  • PM
    PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $15k · revenue -18%
  • US
    UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW
    4× · 2017–2020 · $5k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHARLES WIDGET SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • NS
    NATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • UB
    UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
3
The Florida State University Foundation Inc

The florida state university foundation enhances the academic mission and vision of florida state university through its organized fundraising activities and funds management. the fsu foundation accomplishes its mission by fostering…

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
The University Foundation At Sacramento State

Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
10
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
11
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bess the Book Bus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $82,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERS…University of South Florida Foundation Inc: $60,000 · EducationUniversity of South Florida Foundation IncUCLA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,600 · Education+4 more: $15,000 · Education+4 moreTHE CHARLES WIDGET SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherTHE CHARLES WIDGET SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANO…THE CHARLES WIDGER SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherTHE CHARLES WIDGER SCHOOL OF LAW AT VILLANO…REBUILDING UKRAINE ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherREBUILDING UKRAINE ASSOCIATION INCORPORATEDNATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATIONUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONUCLA SCHOOL OF LAW: $5,100 · OtherXAVERIAN HIGH SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · OtherXAVERIAN: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $10,800 · Other+5 morePROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $15,100 · EmploymentINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,900 · PhilanthropyFLORIDA NEXT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Education$174,600Other$125,900Employment$15,100Philanthropy$10,900Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $82,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC: $15,100 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetNATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA NEXT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC LAW SF FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBESS THE BOOK BUS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROBABILITY MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA NEXT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UC LAW SF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BESS THE BOOK BUS INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution C/O Sterling Foundation LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution C/O Sterling Foundation LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bay Area Legal Services Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Florida Next Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Bess the Book Bus Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Creativity in Dispute Resolution C/O Sterling Foundation LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph