Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fotsch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.6MHuman Services$3.8MReligion$3.5MHealth$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.4MHousing & Shelter$863kPublic Safety & Disaster$738kPublic Benefit$597kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $481k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL THE APOSTLE$1,275,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$336,000
Individual grant recipient$175,000
CAMP ONE STEP$170,100
WOMENS CARE CENTER$149,029
RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI$126,000
CHILDREN'S WI FOUNDATION$112,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$100,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$85,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$75,000
PAULIST FATHERS$75,000
WINMAN TRAILS FOUNDATION$57,500
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION CROSS TRAINERS ACADEMY$50,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$50,000
WISCONSIN EYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $175k → 17%VALLEY OF OUR LADY MONASTERY: $102k → 9%WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $300k → 10%WINMAN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $258k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $75k → 13%CAMP ONE STEP: $170k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $115k → 19%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $160k → 17%WISCONSIN EYE: $250k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $75k → 13%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $150k → 17%WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $160k → 10%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $145k → 17%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $140k → 17%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $125k → 17%THE CARDINAL'S APPEAL: $100k → 17%ST PAUL THE APOSTLE: $1.3M → 17%PAULIST FATHERS: $409k → 17%PAULIST FATHERS: $408k → 17%PAULIST FATHERS: $408k → 17%WOMENS CARE CENTER OF MKE MOTHER MARY CORP: $500k → 17%WOMENS CARE CENTER OF MKE MOTHER MARY CORP: $500k → 17%WOMENS CARE CENTER: $151k → 17%WOMENS CARE CENTER: $149k → 17%WOMENS CARE CENTER: $136k → 17%POTAWATOMI AREA COUNCIL - BSA: $79k → 5%WOMENS CARE CENTER: $114k → 17%WOMENS CARE CENTER: $105k → 17%KATHY'S HOUSE: $345k → 17%KATHY'S HOUSE: $345k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI: $164k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI: $162k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $150k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $150k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI: $126k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $125k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $125k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $100k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $100k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY: $100k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI: $94k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $92k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI: $83k → 17%MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $515k → 17%CHRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $85k → 17%CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $85k → 17%CHRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $85k → 17%CHRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $80k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NE
VA
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 65 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

65 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
12

Total granted

$20M
$421k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+103%

Still filing today

26%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +46%
  • MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $650k · revenue +82% · 25% of their budget
  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
  • SJ
    ST JEROMES CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • MR
    MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
3
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
4
Wisconsin Health Information Organization Inc

The wisconsin health information organization maintains a centralized health care data repository to provide data and information on the quality, safety, cost, and equity of health care to all health care stakeholders for improvement,…

Health
5
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
6
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
7
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
8
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
9
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education
10
Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health
11
Wisconsin Technology Innovation Initiative Inc

Support, promote, and facilitate partnerships with and provide funding for innovative early-stage and startup companies to lessen the burdens of government by promoting economic development and creating sustaining jobs in wisconsin.

—
12
Wisconsin Center for Manufacturing & Productivity

The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Veterans Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sharon Lynne Wilson Center for the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAULIST FATHERS: $1,460,000 · OtherPAULIST FATHERSST PAUL THE APOSTLE: $1,275,000 · OtherST PAUL THE APOSTLETHE SALVATION ARMY: $1,017,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWOMENS CARE CENTER OF MKE MOTHER MARY CORP: $1,000,000 · OtherWOMENS CARE CENTER OF MKE MOTHER MARY CORPIndividual grant recipient: $995,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WI: $837,665 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES-EASTERN WIWOMENS CARE CENTER: $785,639 · OtherWOMENS CARE CENTERCRISTO REY JESUIT MILWAUKEE HIGH SCHOOL INC: $554,080 · Other+65 more: $5,544,375 · Other+65 moreMarquette University: $4,319,200 · EducationMarquette UniversityUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $675,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du La…MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $650,000 · EducationMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTERTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $450,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONS…+1 more: $9,000 · EducationKathy's House Inc: $840,000 · HealthChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $170,100 · HealthFISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Health+1 more: $1,250 · HealthOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $813,277 · Housing & ShelterWISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $547,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $72,000 · Arts & CultureSHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureWAUKESHA COUNTY CENTER FOR GROWTH INC: $325,000 · Community ImprovementWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $214,240 · Animals
Other$13,468,759Education$6,103,200Health$1,101,350Housing & Shelter$813,277Arts & Culture$641,500Community Improvement$325,000Animals$214,240

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $4,319,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $840,000 over 9y, 22% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $813,277 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $675,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $650,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetWISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC: $547,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $450,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY CENTER FOR GROWTH INC: $325,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $214,240 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH LAKELAND DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $72,000 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetElmbrook Education Foundation Inc: $51,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetWISCONSIN VETERANS NETWORK INC: $50,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES HONOR FLIGHT INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWCTC FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMUSIC IN THE PARK INC: $26,500 over 9y, 7.3% of budgetSHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMANITOWISH WATERS BIKE TRAIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ELM GROVE LIBRARY: $9,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetVERSITI BLOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSINEYE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY CENTER FOR GROWTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI25.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Kim and John Schlifske Family Foundation Inc · Francie Luke Silverman Foundation Under the F Silverman Charitable Tr

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fotsch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fotsch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fotsch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph