Skip to content

· Public charity

Fort Wayne Urban Enterprise Association Inc

SEED is dedicated to economic prosperity through equitable business growth and stable jobs for the Fort Wayne community.

$625k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$357k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$853kYouth Development$263kEmployment$151kHealth$52kHousing & Shelter$50kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$20kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $495,785, the rows itemized in this filing. The $625,038 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $129,253 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $357k
$22,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Fort Wayne$356,774
Vincent Village$50,000
Hamburgers Acquisition LLC$25,000
United Four LLC$22,000
Fort Wayne Urban League$17,000
Fort Wayne Parks and Recreati$10,000
Home I Team$8,000
Creative Women of the World$7,011
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Fort Wayne Urban League: $17k → 12%Fort Wayne Urban League: $15k → 12%Fort Wayne Urban League: $15k → 12%POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION: $20k → 12%YMCA YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $11k → 12%YMCA YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $11k → 12%YMCA YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$959k · 7 repeat orgs$493k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$959k
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-12%

Still filing today

43%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue +44%
  • BI
    Believe in a Dream Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $37k · revenue +92%
  • MY
    METROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $28k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • UC
    Utopian Coffee Company
    one grant, 2022 · $148k
  • PA
    Project Active Southeast Foun
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA INNOVATION CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $44k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
2
Pearl Arts Inc

Pearl Arts, Inc. exists to serve Northeast Indiana as an interactive community arts, education, entrepreneurial, and engagement destination.

Arts & Culture
3
Columbus Fashion Initiative

The mission of the columbus fashion initiative is to work with city, corporate, and community stakeholders to create collaborative opportunities and platforms that make columbus, oh the best place to start, grow, and innovate upon a…

Youth Development
4
Initiative for a Competitive Inner City Inc

Icic drives inclusive economic prosperity in under-resourced communities through innovative research and programs to create jobs, income, and wealth for local residents.

Housing & Shelter
5
Northern Indiana Clay Alliance Inc

Northern Indiana Clay Alliance advances ceramic arts education and community engagement in the Michiana region by providing programming, resources and events that support artists, students and arts enthusiasts, while working toward a…

Arts & Culture
6
Indianapolis Private Industry Council

The indianapolis private industry council, inc., doing business as employindy, the workforce investment board for marion county, is a not-for-profit corporation responsible for the development of the marion county workforce. employindy…

Employment
7
Arts United of Greater Fort Wayne Inc

Arts united mobilizes resources to develop, coordinate, and support arts and culture, enhancing the quality of life and the economic viability of northeast indiana.

Arts & Culture
8
Air Institute Corporation

Air provides rural and under-resourced communities with programming that inspires new connections and ignites the creative economy. creative people expand business skills, businesspeople get more creative; they learn to collaborate, adapt,…

Community Improvement
9
Wild Goose Creative Inc

Wild goose creative's mission is to build a creative community at the intersection of art, risk an meaning. wild goose is about a lot of things: sustainable partnerships and artistic collaborations.it's about giving artists resources and…

Arts & Culture
10
Indianapolis Movement Arts Collective

A non-profit arts organization supporting and connecting the indianapolis community through dance and movement.

Arts & Culture
11
Consortium of African American Organizations

To utilize the resources of northeast ohio african americans professional organizatiaons to promote economic in afri-amer community and to enhance career & entreprenerial opportunities for afri-amer

Public Benefit
12
Urban League of Louisiana

To empower communities and help change liver for african americans and other emerging communities and groups. the urban league seeks to eliminate barriers to opportunity and assist individuals in attaining economic self sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Wayne Urban League Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creative Women of the World Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Ft Wayne Parks: $427,868 · OtherCity of Ft Wayne Parks212 CREATIVE NETWORK: $209,994 · Other212 CREATIVE NETWORKWORKBENCH - FORT WAYNE: $150,768 · OtherWORKBENCH - FORT WAYNEUtopian Coffee Company: $147,500 · OtherUtopian Coffee CompanyProject Active Southeast Foun: $100,000 · OtherProject Active Southeast FounMICHAELS SALON & SPA: $58,822 · Other+6 more: $99,401 · Other+6 moreFORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $46,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE: $28,125 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesVINCENT VILLAGE INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHEAST INDIANA INNOVATION CENTER INC: $44,122 · Community ImprovementBelieve in a Dream Inc: $37,142 · EducationArtlink Inc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCreative Women of the World Inc: $7,011 · International
Other$1,194,353Human Services$94,125Housing & Shelter$50,000Community Improvement$44,122Education$37,142Arts & Culture$25,000International$7,011

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVINCENT VILLAGE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC: $46,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA INNOVATION CENTER INC: $44,122 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBelieve in a Dream Inc: $37,142 over 2y, 24% of budgetMETROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE: $28,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetArtlink Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCreative Women of the World Inc: $7,011 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VINCENT VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA INNOVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Believe in a Dream Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE ↗
  • Who funds Artlink Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA POSITIVE RESOURCE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Creative Women of the World Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward M Wilson FoundationPA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward M Wilson Foundation · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Ardelle and Theresa Glaze Foundation · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Parkview Hospital Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fort Wayne Urban Enterprise Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fort Wayne Urban Enterprise Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fort Wayne Urban Enterprise Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph