· Public charity
Fort Madison Sirrc Corporation
FORT MADISON SIRRC CORPORATION accumulates funds in anticipation of making grants to qualified, non-profit organizations within the community specifically for community betterment projects.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTHEAST IOWA AQUATIC RESTORATION | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISOUTHEAST IOWA AQUATIC RESTORATION GROUP INC4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue -97% · 99% of their budget
- FMFORT MADISON RODEO CORPORATION5× · 2017–2024 · $665k · revenue +173%
- FMFORT MADISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE8× · 2017–2024 · $620k · revenue -8% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- FMFORT MADISON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPone grant, 2021 · $450k · revenue -91% · 65% of their budget
- FMFORT MADISON COMMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $75k
- RIROTARY INTERNATIONALone grant, 2019 · $42k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The friends of the historical museum at fort missoula is organized exclusively for the purpose of aiding and supporting the historical museum at fort missoula to keep missoula's history alive for the enjoyment and education of the public.
To provide companionship, entertainment, and social opportunities for people age 60 and over.
Our mission is to interact with all artists, civic, and art organizations - acting as an advocate for arts in all forms in the madison, in area, and to promote the area as an arts and creative destination.
The promotion of altoona, ia
To maintain a historic site
To enhance, retain, and attract commercial, industrial, and agricultural growth, development, and diversity within adams county and its cities, towns and ports.
To support agriculture education and development for youths in lee county, iowa.
Promote enhanced funding of education programs and opportunities for the students of madison school district 321, madison county, idaho.
To advance, encourage, and promote industrial, economic, and civic development in the community of madison, ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Madison Sports Complex Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Services Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHEAST IOWA AQUATIC RESTORATION GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON RODEO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON SPORTS COMPLEX INC ↗
- Who funds SHEAFFER MEMORIAL GOLF PARK ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS CONSERVATION FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds TEST KITCHEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FORT MADISON AREA ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HOLY TRINITY CATHOLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Keokuk Area Community Foundation · William George Kuhlmeier · Lee County Youth Services Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fort Madison Sirrc Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fort Madison Sirrc Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Fort Madison Sirrc Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.