Skip to content
Fort Healthcare Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fort Healthcare Inc

Our mission at fort healthcare is to improve the health and well-being of our community.

$327k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$233kCommunity Improvement$212kRecreation & Sports$90kArts & Culture$22kEducation$15kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $309,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $327,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,350 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $240k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$338M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC$240,000
GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP$35,000
FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$11,000
HEALTHY WISCONSIN ALLIANCE$10,000
BASE FORT ATKINSON$7,500
ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER$6,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER: $10k → 8%YOUNG AUDITORIUM: $8k → 10%CITY OF FORT ATKINSON: $15k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE CAMROCK: $10k → 10%ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER: $7k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN (YOUNG AUDITORIUM): $8k → 10%CITY OF FORT ATKINSON: $15k → 10%HEALTHY WISCONSIN ALLIANCE: $10k → 10%ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM (YOUNG AUDITORIUM): $7k → 10%CITY OF JEFFERSON: $128k → 8%GREATER WHITEWATER COMMITTEE (DISCOVER WHITEWATER SERIES): $5k → 10%CITY OF JEFFERSON: $75k → 8%DISCOVER WHITEWATER SERIES: $5k → 10%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $43k → 8%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $35k → 8%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $35k → 8%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $35k → 8%JEFFERSON COUNTY FAIR PARK: $31k → 8%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 8%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 8%GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $8k → 8%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JEFFERSON: $5k → 8%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JEFFERSON: $5k → 8%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF JEFFERSON: $5k → 8%DODGE-JEFFERSON HEALTHIER COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 8%ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC: $269k → 8%ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC: $260k → 8%ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC: $240k → 8%ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC: $235k → 8%ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC: $220k → 8%ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC: $65k → 8%FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $11k → 8%FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 8%FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 8%BASE FORT ATKINSON: $8k → 8%FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7k → 8%FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7k → 8%FORT ATKINSON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 8%BASE FORT ATKINSON: $6k → 8%FORT ATKINSON HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%SCHOOL DISTRICT OF FORT ATKINSON: $5k → 8%FORT ATKINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 11 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$1.9M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
0%

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +138%
  • GH
    GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP D/B/A THRIVE ED
    7× · 2018–2025 · $215k · revenue +23%
  • RL
    ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $23k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY FAIR PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $31k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CAMROCK TO GLACIAL-DRUMLIN CONNECTOR TRAIL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • DJ
    Dodge Jefferson Healthier Community Partnership
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson Chamber of Commerce

Promote economic development in jefferson wi for its members

—
2
Dickinson Area Chamber of Commerce

The dickinson area chamber of commerce will provide leadership to promote a progressive business environment.

—
3
Frankfort Area Chamber of Commerce

Building a vibrant economy through member driven advocacy & community leadership

—
4
Watertown Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber of commerce

—
5
Fort Madison Area Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the fort madison chamber of commerce is to promote retail and commercial development as well as tourism in fort madison and the surrounding area.

—
6
Fox Cities Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

Fox cities chamber of commerce and industry, inc. is dedicated to developing, advancing, and promoting the economic, industrial, commerical, professional, cultural, and civic welfare of the fox cities area.

—
7
Waupaca Area Chamber Foundation Inc

boost community involvement for individuals and businesses.

Human Services
8
Watertown Area Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Watertown Area Chamber of Commerce is to connect members with one another and provide resources that foster growth and sustainability.

—
9
Alex Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote commerce & industry in alexandria, mn.

Community Improvement
10
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

—
11
Fort Madison Economic Development Corp

Promotion of area enconomic development.

Community Improvement
12
Washington Economic Development Group

Coordinate area economic development

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rock Lake Activity Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dodge Jefferson Healthier Community Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $1,288,680 · HealthROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC+1 more: $10,000 · HealthCITY OF JEFFERSON LIBRARY: $203,000 · OtherCITY OF JEFFERSON LIBRA…FORT ATKINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $50,200 · OtherFORT ATKINSON AREA CHAM…JEFFERSON COUNTY FAIR PARK: $30,500 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY FAIR P…CITY OF FORT ATKINSON: $30,000 · OtherCITY OF FORT ATKINSONROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $23,150 · OtherROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENT…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $21,875 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINSCHOOL DISTRICT OF JEFFERSON: $15,000 · Other+3 more: $30,250 · Other+3 moreGLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP D/B/A THRIVE ED: $215,000 · Community ImprovementGLACIAL HERIT…GREATER WHITEWATER COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementBADGERLAND AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $13,500 · EducationFORT ATKINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Health$1,298,680Other$403,975Community Improvement$225,000Education$13,500Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $1,288,680 over 6y, 20% of budgetGLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP D/B/A THRIVE ED: $215,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetFORT ATKINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $50,200 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $23,150 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetBADGERLAND AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $13,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetDodge Jefferson Healthier Community Partnership: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGREATER WHITEWATER COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCK RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GLACIAL HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP D/B/A THRIVE ED ↗
  • Who funds FORT ATKINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BADGERLAND AFTER SCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY WISCONSIN ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dodge Jefferson Healthier Community Partnership ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WHITEWATER COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT ATKINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Watertown Com…Fort Atkinson Communi…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Watertown Community Health Foundation IncWI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Watertown Community Health Foundation Inc · Fort Atkinson Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fort Healthcare Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fort Healthcare Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fort Healthcare Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fort Healthcare Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fort Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home