Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fort Foundation Tch

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$557kEducation$204kArts & Culture$186kEnvironment$186kPublic Safety & Disaster$93kYouth Development$93kHuman Services$93kInternational$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,450
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANDERBILT CANCER CENTER$30,900
VANDERBILT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$30,900
ALIVE HOSPICE$30,900
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH$18,540
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$15,450
UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE$15,450
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,450
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TN$15,450
SAVE THE CHILDREN$15,450
TRAVELLERS REST MUSEUM$15,450
NASHVILLE SYMPHONY$15,450
WEST END UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,450
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$15,450
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NASHVILLE$15,450
BEREA COLLEGE$15,450
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALIVE HOSPICE: $34k → 13%ALIVE HOSPICE: $32k → 13%ALIVE HOSPICE: $31k → 13%ALIVE HOSPICE: $30k → 13%ALIVE HOSPICE: $30k → 13%ALIVE HOSPICE: $29k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$1.9M
$0

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALIVE HOSPICE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $186k · revenue +5%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $111k · revenue +53%
  • TJ
    THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NASHVILLE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $93k · revenue +110%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Vanderbilt University

    See Disclosure Above.

    Education
    2
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    3
    DePauw University

    Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

    Education
    4
    Furman University

    The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

    Education
    5
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    6
    Greensboro College

    Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

    Education
    7
    Tennessee State Collaborative On Reforming Education

    The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…

    Education
    8
    Augustana College

    Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

    Education
    9
    Belhaven University

    Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

    Education
    10
    National Collegiate Athletic Association

    Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

    Recreation & Sports
    11
    Anderson University

    The university is a comprehensive university affiliated with the south carolina baptist convention offering bachelors, masters, and doctorate degrees. located on approximately 398 acres in the upstate region of south carolina near the…

    Education
    12
    The George Washington University

    The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berea College; the most unlike its peers is Nashville Symphony Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    VANDERBILT CANCER CENTER: $185,500 · OtherVANDERBILT CANCER CENTERVANDERBILT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $185,500 · OtherVANDERBILT CHILDREN'S HOSPITALTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $139,750 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSALVATION ARMY: $92,750 · OtherSALVATION ARMYWEST END METHODIST CHURCH: $92,750 · OtherWEST END METHODIST CHURCHAMERICAN RED CROSS: $92,750 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSTRAVELLERS REST MUSEUM: $92,750 · OtherTRAVELLERS REST MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient: $50,200 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF TN: $45,750 · Other+2 more: $54,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $111,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…BEREA COLLEGE: $92,750 · EducationBEREA COLLEG…ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $185,500 · Human ServicesALIVE HOSPI…THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NASHVILLE INC: $92,750 · Community ImprovementBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $92,750 · Youth DevelopmentNashville Symphony Association: $92,750 · Arts & CultureSave The Children Federation Inc: $92,750 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $62,750 · Philanthropy
    Other$1,031,700Education$204,050Human Services$185,500Community Improvement$92,750Youth Development$92,750Arts & Culture$92,750International$92,750Philanthropy$62,750

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $185,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $111,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NASHVILLE INC: $92,750 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $92,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNashville Symphony Association: $92,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $92,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $92,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $62,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds ALIVE HOSPICE INC ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
    • Who funds THE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NASHVILLE INC ↗
    • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
    • Who funds Nashville Symphony Association ↗
    • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
    • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Fort Foundation Tch funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fort Foundation Tch. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
    • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fort Foundation Tch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph