Skip to content

· Private foundation

Forrest & Martha Johnson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$145kReligion$57kInternational$37kHuman Services$28kHealth$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kEducation$8kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEYVILLE LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION$30,700
BLUFF DALEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$21,000
STEPHENVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
DALE BLUFF VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$5,000
LIONS CLUB INTERNATIONAL$4,000
CROSS TIMBERS FINE ARTS COUNCIL$2,000
ERATH COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COLLEYVILLE LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $31k → 11%COLLEYVILLE LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $18k → 11%COLLEYVILLE LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$407k · 14 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$407k
$29k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    COLLEYVILLE LIONS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $59k · revenue +13%
  • CF
    COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • EC
    ERATH COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHAPLAINS ASSISTANCE FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k
  • BD
    BLUFF DALEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • OU
    OAKDALE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cry for Help Rescue

CFHR brings in dogs and cats from owner surrender or shelters. We foster the animals, give them needed vet treatment then find them suitable homes.

Animals
2
2ND Hand Ranch and Rescue

Helping injured abandoned animals. Sanctuary for old dogs & horses. Rehabilitation of wildlife. Education to the public on animals and nature.

Animals
3
Caring Hearts 4 Paws

Animal Rescue and medical treatment assistance

Animals
4
Ranch Critters

Animal rescues, horses

Animals
5
Corgie Run Farms Inc

Care of handicapped animals

Animals
6
East Texas Hoof and Paw Animal Rescue

Animal rescue

Animals
7
Dallys Hope 4 Paws Rescue Inc

Rescue & foster dogs until they find their furever homes.

Animals
8
Ozzis Angels

Animal Rescue and Adoption

Animals
9
Ark Rescue Rehab and Foster

Dog rescue and adoption

Animals
10
Paws of Dixie Animal Rescue

We are an animal rescue in the deep south

Animals
11
Charlies Forever Farm

Farm animal rescue

Animals
12
Furever Friends

Animal rescue facility. minimal foster homes. provide housing vet care to homeless dogs

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Chance Farm; the most unlike its peers is Cross Timbers Fine Arts Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEYVILLE LIONS CLUB: $145,390 · OtherCOLLEYVILLE LIONS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LUKES METHODIST CHURCH: $28,360 · OtherST LUKES METHODIST CHURCHBLUFF DALE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 · OtherBLUFF DALE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSTEPHENVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherSTEPHENVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $17,084 · OtherALZHEIMERS: $16,000 · OtherCHAPLAINS ASSISTANCE FUND: $15,000 · Other+7 more: $53,500 · Other+7 moreCOLLEYVILLE LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $59,100 · Human ServicesCOLLEYVILLE L…GLOBAL HANDS INC: $29,000 · InternationalBluff Dale Volunteer Fire Dept: $12,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCROSS TIMBERS FINE ARTS COUNCIL: $9,000 · Arts & CultureSECOND CHANCE FARM: $5,000 · Animals
Other$368,334Human Services$59,100International$29,000Public Safety & Disaster$12,000Arts & Culture$9,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEYVILLE LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $59,100 over 3y, 17% of budgetBluff Dale Volunteer Fire Dept: $12,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCOMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND: $10,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetCROSS TIMBERS FINE ARTS COUNCIL: $9,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FARM: $5,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetERATH COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEYVILLE LIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bluff Dale Volunteer Fire Dept ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CROSS TIMBERS FINE ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SECOND CHANCE FARM ↗
  • Who funds ERATH COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Forrest & Martha Johnson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Forrest & Martha Johnson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Forrest & Martha Johnson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph