· Public charity
Form Communities Inc
Form communities serves adults that suffer severe and persistant mental illness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $552,632 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,304,877 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $752,245 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $166k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $387k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLAN CLUBHOUSE | $94,536 |
| BRAIN INJURY NETWORK DALLAS | $86,578 |
| HOPE FORT BEND CLUBHOUSE | $78,378 |
| COWTOWN CLUBHOUSE | $72,572 |
| SAN ANGELO CLUBHOUSE | $54,905 |
| ST JOSEPH CLUBHOUSE | $47,481 |
| SMITH COUNTY CLUBHOUSE | $38,469 |
| PHEONIX HOUSE | $32,405 |
| REAL CLUBHOUSE | $27,133 |
| GALVESTON CLUBHOUSE | $20,175 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE2× · 2023–2024 · $153k · revenue +52%
- MHMagnificat Houses Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $106k · revenue +109%
- SCSMITH COUNTY CLUBHOUSE2× · 2023–2024 · $63k · revenue +51% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- ACAustin Clubhouse Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $58k · revenue +106%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Polaris House Clubhouse, like all clubhouse model programs, is dedicated to the recovery of men and women with mental illness by providing opportunities for members to work and learn, while contributing their talents through a community of…
Work, education and programs for members whose lives have been disrupted by mental illness with a daytime place to stay and programs to participate in social activities, engage in meaningful work, enjoy healthy meals, and prepare for…
The Well Community provides hope and stability to adults living with mental illnesses through healthy relationships, essential services and meaningful activities.
The mission of Crossroads Clubhouse is to be a community of support and hope for adults diagnosed with mental illness by providing choices and opportunities for meaningful employment, housing, education, wellness, and social interaction.
The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.
Tarry House operates group homes to provide shelter, food and,services to adults with severe mental disorders
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…
The mission of Iris Clubhouse is to save lives, remove barriers and build success stories for people with mental illness. This is accomplished through meaningful work, employment opportunities, education and access to effective services…
When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…
The mission of NAMI Central Texas is to improve the lives of all persons affected by serious mental illness by providing support, education and advocacy through a grassroots network.
Provide supportive living services to adults with autism.
Our mission is to provide a supportive community for people living with mental illness, so they can find purpose, support, connection, and opportunities to achieve their full potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Fort Bend Clubhouse and the most unlike its peers is Rural Economic Assistance League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds BIND- Brain Injury Network of Dallas ↗
- Who funds CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds Magnificat Houses Inc ↗
- Who funds Hope Fort Bend Clubhouse ↗
- Who funds TARRANT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE ↗
- Who funds SMITH COUNTY CLUBHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Austin Clubhouse Inc ↗
- Who funds RURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds GALVESTON COUNTY CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Form Communities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.