Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fongsong Life Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$212k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$596kInternational$22kPublic Benefit$16kArts & Culture$12kRecreation & Sports$12kYouth Development$2kFood & Nutrition$1kCivil Rights$1k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$75,000
SHINSHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$15,060
SOAR FOUNDATION$14,550
WWII PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL$10,000
PEACH FOUNDATION$9,000
HANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMER$6,000
BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO$4,500
YOUTH 4 GOOD FOUNDATION$2,000
CIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PEACH FOUNDATION: $17k → 7%CIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $8k → 8%SHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18k → 10%WWII PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL: $10k → 10%CALIFORNIA FFA FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%BLU EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $600 → 14%LAFAYETTE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $5k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%PEACH FOUNDATION: $16k → 7%CIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $4k → 8%SHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%WWII PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $68k → 10%PEACH FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%CIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $4k → 8%SHINSHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%WWII PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%PEACH FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%CIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $800 → 8%SHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%PEACH FOUNDATION: $12k → 7%THE MILPITAS COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL: $3k → 8%SHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%PEACH FOUNDATION: $11k → 7%SHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PEACH FOUNDATION: $9k → 7%YOUTH 4 GOOD FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%SHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $16k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%SOAR FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO: $8k → 10%HANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMER: $6k → 10%HANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMER: $6k → 10%HANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMER: $5k → 10%BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO: $5k → 10%BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO: $4k → 10%BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO: $3k → 10%BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO: $2k → 10%HANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$575k · 9 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$575k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+30%

Still filing today

56%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $243k · revenue +21%
  • TP
    THE PEACH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $92k · revenue +11%
  • TS
    THE SOAR FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • LP
    Lafayette Partners in Educationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +30%
  • TM
    THE MILPITAS COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • CF
    CALIFORNIA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Educ Campaign

Dosti sets up and manages schools in asian countries

Philanthropy
2
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
3
Hua Xia Education Foundation
Education
4
Us - China Policy Foundation
5
Cyrus Tang Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Helen Gee Chin Scholarship Foundationc/O Calvin Chin Trustee

The helen gee chin scholarshup foundation was founded to honor the memory of helen g. chin, wife of sifu chin of calvin chin's martial arts academy, inc. (ccmaa) the scholarhip is open to any student who is enrolled full- time as a college…

Philanthropy
7
Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundationinc

Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundation, Inc. ("FFOF") was established by five alumni from Fudan Fuzhong, the high school affiliated with Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Fudan University is one of the leading institutes of higher education…

Education
8
California University - Silicon Valley

Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.

Education
9
Hkanc Scholarship Foundation

The foundation's sole activity is the awarding of scholarships to undergraduate and graduate university students of high academic distinction. this is based on the belief that investing in today's youth will help to ensure that students…

Philanthropy
10
Vietnam Education Fund
Education
11
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
12
Foundation to Support Education Worldwide
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Peach Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ww Ii Pacific War Memorial Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $243,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONTHE PEACH FOUNDATION — $92,200 · EducationTHE PEACH FOUNDATIONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITYTHE SOAR FOUNDATION — $65,760 · EducationTHE SOAR FOUNDATIONHANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $18,950 · Education+2 more — $5,750 · EducationSHIN SHIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $92,460 · OtherSHIN SHIN EDUCATION FO…BRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIO — $21,950 · OtherBRIDGE ROAD INTERNATIO…GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $12,000 · OtherGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSI…+4 more — $6,631 · OtherCIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $16,200 · Youth DevelopmentWW II PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL — $12,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$500,660Other$133,041Youth Development$16,200Arts & Culture$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $243,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEACH FOUNDATION — $92,200 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SOAR FOUNDATION — $65,760 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $16,200 over 4y, 88% of budgetWW II PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL — $12,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLafayette Partners in Education — $5,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION — $1,052 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLU Educational Foundation — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE PEACH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE SOAR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HANLIN EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds CIVIC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
  • Who funds WW II PACIFIC WAR MEMORIAL HALL
  • Who funds Lafayette Partners in Education
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BLU Educational Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fongsong Life Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph