Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Focus on Hope Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$102kHuman Services$17kCrime & Legal$11kHousing & Shelter$9kReligion$4kEducation$309Youth Development$160Community Improvement$150Other$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$523
Median grant
1
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCOTLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$5,269
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,077
CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR HOMELESS$905
Individual grant recipient$523
SCOTLAND COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$150
HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY$100
SCOTLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS$67
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NC: $100 → 16%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NC: $50 → 16%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $2k → 24%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $745 → 24%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $728 → 24%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $565 → 24%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $541 → 24%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $100 → 24%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $100 → 24%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $50 → 24%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $30 → 24%HOSPICE OF SCOTLAND COUNTY: $25 → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -39% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$141k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-39%

Still filing today

58%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $217 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    Scotland Memorial Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $65k · revenue +0%
  • SM
    Scotland Memorial Hospital Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $34k · revenue +22%
  • SAFECHILD
    2× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • DS
    DELANCEY STREET FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • SC
    SCOTLAND COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2018 · $192
  • TH
    THE HELPING HAND
    one grant, 2022 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

2
Hospice of Lake Cumberland Inc

Hospice of lake cumberland offers compassionate care to patients and families struggling to cope with a life-threatening illness.

Human Services
3
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

4
Ccmh Corporation

Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.

Health
5
Hospice of Surry County Inc

Our mission is creating the best experience for those facing serious illness - every patient, every family, every time.

Human Services
6
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

7
Scotland County Humane Society Inc

Schs is an animal welfare organization whose mission is to shelter, protect and promote the adoption of homeless animals as well as provide education about responsible pet ownership. schs also has a spay/neuter program to help reduce pet…

Animals
8
Hospice of Cumberland County Inc

Provide hospice services, and educate the general public on the importance of superior quality hospice services.

Human Services
9
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Cancer Services Inc

Our mission is "enhancing health, life & survivorship" for those living with cancer in our community.

Health
11
Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
12
Scotland County Senior Center Inc

Provide meals for senior citizens

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scotland Memorial Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is She Rocks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Scotland Memorial Foundation Inc — $65,425 · HealthScotland Memorial Foundation IncScotland Memorial Hospital Inc — $33,549 · HealthScotland Memorial Hospital Inc+1 more — $20 · HealthFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $16,164 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIS…CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR HOMELESS — $5,897 · OtherCONCERNED CITIZENS FO…Individual grant recipient — $2,083 · OtherIndividual grant reci…DELANCEY STREET FOUNDATION — $1,855 · OtherDELANCEY STREET FOUND…+8 more — $811 · OtherSAFECHILD — $10,559 · Crime & LegalCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE HOMELESS INC — $2,840 · Human ServicesHospice of Scotland County Inc — $2,518 · Human ServicesCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC — $2,014 · Human Services+1 more — $150 · Human Services
Health$98,994Other$26,810Crime & Legal$10,559Human Services$7,522

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetScotland Memorial Foundation Inc — $65,425 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetScotland Memorial Hospital Inc — $33,549 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFECHILD — $10,559 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE HOMELESS INC — $2,840 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHospice of Scotland County Inc — $2,518 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC — $2,014 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetChildren's Home Society of North Carolina Inc — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHE ROCKS INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Scotland Memorial Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Scotland Memorial Hospital Inc
  • Who funds SAFECHILD
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE HOMELESS INC
  • Who funds Hospice of Scotland County Inc
  • Who funds CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc
  • Who funds SHE ROCKS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina Community FoundationNC13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Focus on Hope Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Focus on Hope Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Focus on Hope Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph