Skip to content

· Public charity

Fluid Fertilizer Foundation Inc

To provide grants to institutions of higher education

$102k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Science & Tech$259kEducation$99kFood & Nutrition$70kPhilanthropy$12k
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION$15,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$15,000
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY$11,500
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$10,000
USDA ARS$8,300
A&L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES INC$7,803
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $10k → 14%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE EXTENSION SERV: $11k → 22%MIDWEST INDEPENDENT SOIL SAMPLERS: $8k → 9%IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%KSU FOUNDATION: $24k → 20%UGA CROP & SOIL SCIENCES: $12k → 27%COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 11%A&L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES INC: $8k → 12%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $11k → 19%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 24%TREASURER OF VIRGINIA TECH: $6k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $10k → 8%IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%KSU FOUNDATION: $24k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $12k → 27%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $11k → 19%TREASURER OF VIRGINIA TECH: $6k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $10k → 8%KSU FOUNDATION: $18k → 20%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $11k → 19%KSU DEPT OF AGRONOMY: $17k → 20%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 19%KSU DEPT OF AGRONOMY: $12k → 20%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IA
IN
CO
KY
VA
KS
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 10 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$295k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+39%

Still filing today

30%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $42k · revenue +107%
  • IS
    IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +39%
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • IS
    IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • UC
    UGA CROP & SOIL SCIENCES
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $31,500 · OtherKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITYIOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · OtherIOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATIONKSU DEPT OF AGRONOMY: $29,000 · OtherKSU DEPT OF AGRONOMYUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $22,400 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $19,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $19,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherUGA CROP & SOIL SCIENCES: $12,000 · OtherTREASURER OF VIRGINIA TECH: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $12,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,500 · Other+5 more: $44,303 · Other+5 moreKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $42,000 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY F…University of Kentucky Research Foundation: $30,000 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky Re…TEXAS A&M RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTEXAS A&M RESEARCH FOUNDA…University of Illinois Foundation: $11,200 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Fo…Association for the Advancement of Industrial Crops: $8,300 · Science & Tech
Other$333,203Education$98,200Science & Tech$8,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS A&M RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $11,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IOWA SOYBEAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS A&M RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Association for the Advancement of Industrial Crops ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fluid Fertilizer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fluid Fertilizer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fluid Fertilizer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph