Skip to content

· Private foundation

Floyd & Garnet Summers Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Membership Benefit$82kHuman Services$25kReligion$20kFood & Nutrition$14kPhilanthropy$9kRecreation & Sports$6kArts & Culture$5kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$267k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNTAIN PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$7,500
CARDINAL GREENWAY INC$5,000
Community Foundation of Randolph County$3,500
PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF UNION CITY$3,011
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%Cancer Services of Randolph County: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 8 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$129k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FOUNTAIN PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $72k · revenue +44%
  • RC
    RANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $15k · revenue +31%
  • JM
    JAMES MOORMAN ORPHANS HOME
    2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +20% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • RC
    REITENOUR CEMETERY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • LC
    LYNN COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNTAIN PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIA: $72,350 · OtherFOUNTAIN PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIARANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INC: $15,224 · OtherRANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INCWINCHSTER AREA CHURCHES AND COMMUNITY: $14,000 · OtherWINCHSTER AREA CHURCHES AND COMMUNITYLYNN COMMUNITY FOOD PANTY: $11,250 · OtherLYNN COMMUNITY FOOD PANTYREITENOUR CEMETERY INC: $10,000 · OtherREITENOUR CEMETERY INCJAMES MOORMAN ORPHANS HOME: $10,000 · OtherJAMES MOORMAN ORPHANS HOME+13 more: $21,780 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $8,500 · PhilanthropyCARDINAL GREENWAY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCANCER SERVICES FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$154,604Philanthropy$8,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNTAIN PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIA: $72,350 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetRANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INC: $15,224 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJAMES MOORMAN ORPHANS HOME: $10,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRESERVATION SOCIETY OF UNION CITY: $4,011 over 2y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNTAIN PARK CEMETERY ASSOCIA ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES MOORMAN ORPHANS HOME ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GREENWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF UNION CITY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SERVICES FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James a Myers Charitable Memorial TrustIN24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James a Myers Charitable Memorial Trust · Robert & Helen Holloway Charitable Trust · The Howard & Oveta Pegg Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Randolph County Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Floyd & Garnet Summers Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Floyd & Garnet Summers Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Floyd & Garnet Summers Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Floyd & Garnet Summers Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Floyd & Garnet Summers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph