Skip to content
Florida Kiwanis Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Florida Kiwanis Foundation Inc

To enable caring individuals, clubs, and divisions to combine their resources of time, talent, and funds to create a greater impact on the needs of children and families in florida.

$240k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$236kEducation$78kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$30kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Benefit$6kHealth$5kMembership Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $117,167, the rows itemized in this filing. The $239,811 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $122,644 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $72k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIWANIS CLUB OF PALM BEACH GARDENS$19,500
KIWANIS CLUB OF PANAMA CITY$12,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER PALM HARBOR$10,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF MULBERRY$10,000
KIWANIS DIVISION 13 COUNCIL$10,000
FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL$10,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF TALLAHASSEE NORTHSIDE$9,917
KIWANIS CLUB OF DUNEDIN$9,125
KIWANIS CLUB OF WAKULLA$9,125
KIWANIS CLUB OF CLERMONT$9,125
KIWANIS CLUB OF LAKE REGION$8,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 9%KIWANIS CLUB OF MELBOURNE: $9k → 10%KIWANIS CLUB OF NORTHSIDE NAPLES: $6k → 10%FORT MYERS EDISON KIWANIS CLUB: $5k → 11%FLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB: $22k → 11%KIWANIS CLUB OF PALM BEACH GARDENS: $20k → 11%FLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB: $25k → 12%KIWANIS CLUB OF SAFETLY HARBOR: $6k → 12%KIWANIS CLUB OF SOUTH LAKE CLERMONT INC: $10k → 13%KIWANIS CLUB OF HALLENDAE BEACH INC: $6k → 13%KIWANIS CLUB OF JACKSONVILLE BEACHES: $10k → 14%KIWANIS CLUB OF LITTLE HAVANA: $10k → 15%KIWANIS CLUB OF UMATILLA: $10k → 16%KIWANIS CLUB OF MULBERRY: $10k → 16%KIWANIS CLUB OF BIG LAGOON: $5k → 16%KIWANIS CLUB OF TALLAHASSEE NORTHSIDE: $12k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB OF GAINESVILLE: $7k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB OF LAKE REGION: $8k → 9%KIWANIS CLUB OF NORTHSIDE NAPLES: $10k → 10%FLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB: $21k → 11%FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL: $24k → 12%KIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER WEST PASCO: $10k → 12%KIWANIS CLUB OF SOUTH LAKE CLERMONT INC: $10k → 13%KIWANIS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD: $10k → 13%KIWANIS CLUB OF CITRUS CENTER - LAKELAND: $10k → 16%KIWANIS CLUB OF TALLAHASSEE NORTHSIDE: $10k → 19%FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL: $19k → 11%KIWANIS DIVISION 13 COUNCIL: $10k → 12%KIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER ORLANDO-WINTER PARK INC: $7k → 13%KIWANIS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $7k → 13%KIWANIS CLUB OF WAKULLA: $9k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB OF TOP OF THE BAY: $10k → 12%KIWANIS CLUB OF TALLAHASSEE NORTHSIDE: $7k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK: $10k → 12%FLORIDA DISCTRICT DIV 3: $10k → 19%KIWANIS CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 8 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
18

Total granted

$237k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+42%

Still filing today

50%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $67k · revenue +115%
  • FD
    FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +37%
  • KI
    KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $28k

Funded once

  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF SOUTH LAKE CLERMONT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF DAVIE WEST HOLLYWOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kiwanis Club of Flagler County

Distribute funds to student programs

Community Improvement
2
Kiwanis Club of Greater Collier Foundation Inc

To improve the lives of children one community one child at a time. To prevent childhood drowning.

—
3
Kiwanis Club of Pensacola

Sponsoring Youth Programs in the Community

—
4
Kiwanis Club of Lakeland Florida Inc

To change the world one child at a time

—
5
Kiwanis Club of Lauderdale Lakes Inc

Community and youth outhreach programs

—
6
Kiwanis Club of Central Florida Seminole County

Helping children one child at a time

—
7
Kiwanis Club of Longboat Key Inc

Kiwanis is dedicated to changing the world through service to the community.

Community Improvement
8
Kiwanis International Inc

Provide Community Service

—
9
Sarasota Kiwanis Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
10
Kiwanis International Inc

Donation to children in community

Public Benefit
11
Kiwanis Club of Greater Brandon Foundation Inc

Serving the children of the community

Education
12
Kiwanis Club of Inverness Florida Inc

To provide the activities and means to support the needs of area children and/or those organizations that provide the basic necessities and opportunities to meet those needs.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kiwanis Club of Stuart Florida Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Florida Association for Infant Mental Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIWANIS CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FOUNDATION INC: $29,720 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF PINELLAS PARK FOUNDATION INCKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $28,417 · OtherKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INCKIWANIS CLUB OF SOUTH LAKE CLERMONT INC: $20,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF STUART FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF PALM BEACH GARDENS: $19,500 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF DAVIE WEST HOLLYWOOD: $19,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF MELBOURNE FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $18,850 · OtherKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL INC: $17,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB AT THE BEACHES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $16,700 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB OF NORTHSIDE NAPLES INC: $16,350 · Other+21 more: $186,465 · Other+21 moreFLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL INC: $66,750 · Youth DevelopmentFLORIDA DISTRI…FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL: $52,749 · EducationFLORIDA DIS…Florida Association for Infant Mental Health Inc: $5,008 · HealthKIWANIS CLUB OF BIG LAGOON FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$392,002Youth Development$66,750Education$52,749Health$5,008Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL INC: $66,750 over 3y, 10% of budgetFLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL: $52,749 over 3y, 22% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF STUART FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF NORTHSIDE NAPLES INC: $16,350 over 2y, 42% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF PANAMA CITY: $12,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetKiwanis Club of Little Havana Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKIWANIS DIVISION 13 COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFlorida Association for Infant Mental Health Inc: $5,008 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF BIG LAGOON FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA DISTRICT OF CIRCLE K INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF STUART FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF NORTHSIDE NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF PANAMA CITY ↗
  • Who funds Kiwanis Club of the Citrus Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Kiwanis Club of Little Havana Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS DIVISION 13 COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Florida Association for Infant Mental Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF BIG LAGOON FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florida Kiwanis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florida Kiwanis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Florida Kiwanis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home