Skip to content
Florida Coalition for Children Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Florida Coalition for Children Foundation Inc

To provide educational materials, training and information technology to agencies who work on behalf of florida's abused and neglected children and function as a service agency for the membership.

$73k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Human Services$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kYouth Development$5k
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $47,561, the rows itemized in this filing. The $72,611 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,720
Median grant
2
States reached
$915k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF SW FLORIDA$10,340
NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY$8,406
ADOPTION-SHARE$7,250
A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY$5,720
ARNETTE HOUSE$5,328
KIDS IN DISTRESS INC$5,308
CARLTON MANOR$5,209
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBOR TO FAMILY: $8k → 12%CARLTON MANOR: $5k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $15k → 13%A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY: $6k → 13%KIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $5k → 13%ARNETTE HOUSE: $5k → 16%ADOPTION-SHARE: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDANEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC: $8,406 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INCADOPTION-SHARE INC: $7,250 · Human ServicesADOPTION-SHARE INCA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,720 · Human ServicesA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INCARNETTE HOUSE INC: $5,328 · Human ServicesARNETTE HOUSE INCKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $5,308 · Human ServicesKIDS IN DISTRESS INCCARLTON MANOR INC: $5,209 · Human ServicesCARLTON MANOR INCCHILDREN'S NETWORK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC: $10,340 · OtherCHILDREN'S NETWORK…
Human Services$52,221Other$10,340

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO FAMILY INC: $8,406 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADOPTION-SHARE INC: $7,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARNETTE HOUSE INC: $5,328 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $5,308 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARLTON MANOR INC: $5,209 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florida Coalition for Children Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florida Coalition for Children Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Carlton Manor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $9k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Florida Coalition for Children’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home