Skip to content

· Private foundation

Florence Petrlik Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$414kArts & Culture$40kReligion$25kHuman Services$21kHousing & Shelter$19kEnvironment$17kEducation$14kCommunity Improvement$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,675
Median grant
8
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND$50,000
MGH - MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$36,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION$13,000
BOSTON BALLET$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WELLESLEY VILLAGE CHURCH$8,000
THE HUMAN RELATIONS SERVICE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CITY YEAR BOSTON$3,000
SCARBOROUGH LAND TRUST$2,675
EASTERN TRAIL ALLIANCE$2,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$2,000
FIND THE CAUSE BREAST CANCER FND$2,000
BOSTON MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $2k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $1k → 16%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $1k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WONDERERS: $3k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WONDERERS: $1k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WONDERERS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
RI
UT
MD
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 20 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$549k
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-2%

Still filing today

60%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +50%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +9%
  • BOSTON BALLET INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CA
    CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TS
    TOURETTE SYNDROME CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • MG
    MA GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership Inc D/B/a Metro Housing Boston

Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.

Housing & Shelter
3
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Berkeley Retirement Home Inc

None

—
6
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
9
Walkboston Inc

Walkmassachusetts makes walking safer and easier in massachusetts to encourage better health, a cleaner environment and vibrant communities.

Unclassified
10
Northeast Human Resources Association Inc

The mission of the northeast human resources association is to lead, advance and influence the management of human resources and its impact on organizational success.

—
11
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
12
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Home for Little Wanderers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Raynaud's Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMGH - MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $81,000 · OtherMGH - MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALCURE ALZHEIMERS FUND: $50,000 · OtherCURE ALZHEIMERS FUNDTOURETTE SYNDROME CENTER: $35,000 · OtherTOURETTE SYNDROME CENTERWELLESLEY VILLAGE CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherWELLESLEY VILLAGE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+29 more: $98,540 · Other+29 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUND…NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $45,000 · HealthNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATIONHUMAN RELATIONS SERVICE INC: $15,000 · HealthHUMAN RELATIONS SERVICE INC+1 more: $3,000 · HealthBOSTON BALLET INC: $34,875 · Arts & CultureBOSTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureROSIE'S PLACE INC: $9,050 · Housing & ShelterVIETNAM VETERANS WORKSHOP INC DBA NEW ENGLAND CENTER AND HOME FOR VETERANS: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $4,000 · Human ServicesEastern Trail Alliance: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsPROJECT GRACE: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$413,540Health$213,000Arts & Culture$37,875Housing & Shelter$13,050Human Services$9,000Recreation & Sports$6,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON BALLET INC: $34,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RELATIONS SERVICE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $9,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Trail Alliance: $6,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS WORKSHOP INC DBA NEW ENGLAND CENTER AND HOME FOR VETERANS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRaynaud's Association Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHOOD COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSheJumps: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF SOUTHERN RHODE ISLAND: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RELATIONS SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Trail Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS WORKSHOP INC DBA NEW ENGLAND CENTER AND HOME FOR VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Raynaud's Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAINE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florence Petrlik Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florence Petrlik Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans: 81% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children: 22% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Boston Center for the Arts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Ballet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Florence Petrlik Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph