Skip to content

· Public charity

Flint Hills Coordianted Transit Council Inc

Enhance coordinated transit efforts in riley, geary, pottawamie dickinson, and marshall counties in the state of kansas.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$605k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$4.8MHuman Services$4.6MPublic Benefit$88k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $450k
  • $250k+1 grant · $605k
$151,799
Median grant
1
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLINT HILLS AREA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY$605,008
CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE$166,442
MARSHALL COUNTY AGENCY ON AGING$151,799
POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION$131,523
HERINGTON HILLTOP COMMUNITY CENTER$12,976
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $771k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $166k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $148k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $148k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $76k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $68k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $51k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $43k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $37k → 12%CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE: $34k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$9.5M
$0

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.1M · revenue +79% · 29% of their budget
  • MC
    MARSHALL COUNTY AGENCY ON AGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M
  • PC
    POTTAWATOMIE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    2/2
    Grantees still filing
    2/2
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency: $6,143,658 · OtherFlint Hills Area Transportation AgencyMARSHALL COUNTY AGENCY ON AGING: $1,282,475 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY AGENCY ON AGINGPOTTAWATOMIE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION: $1,044,963 · OtherPOTTAWATOMIE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION+3 more: $235,326 · OtherCLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE INC: $770,922 · Human ServicesCLAY COUN…
    Other$8,706,422Human Services$770,922

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFlint Hills Area Transportation Agency: $6,143,658 over 9y, 29% of budgetCLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE INC: $770,922 over 9y, 47% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency ↗
    • Who funds CLAY COUNTY TASK FORCE INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Flint Hills Coordianted Transit Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flint Hills Coordianted Transit Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Flint Hills Coordianted Transit Council Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Flint Hills Coordianted Transit Council Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Flint Hills Coordianted Transit Council’s filings →

      More from the funding graph