Skip to content

· Public charity

Flint and Genesee Chamber Foundation

The Flint & Genesee Foundation's purpose is to receive and administer funds for educational, scientific and charitable purposes and for public welfare of Genesee County, Michigan.

$4.5M
Granted FY2021
304
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.8MCommunity Improvement$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.5MArts & Culture$1.4MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MRecreation & Sports$997kEmployment$304kOther$0
02FY2021 · 304 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$184M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
PESTOS INC$19,733
635 S SAGINAW LLC DBA THE CORK ON$18,643
BIG ENTERPRISES DBA B'S BOWLING CEN$17,750
FLINT CREPE COMPANY LLC$17,436
RACHEL HOUGEN DBA SEMI-SWEETS LLC$17,393
FIRESIDE COFFEE COMPANY INC$17,393
REDWOOD BREWING CO INC DBA REDWOOD$17,393
HOFFMAN'S DECO DELI & CAFE LLC$17,393
STARITA-BLACKSTONE'S SMOKEHOUSE$17,392
DTFNT INC DBA CHURCHILL'S FOOD & SP$17,253
ITALIA GARDENS INC$16,375
Individual grant recipient$16,200
JACKIE RAE EARLEY DBA COMPUNINJAS$16,000
FLINT FARMERS MARKET LLC$15,768
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHIAWASSEE FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 12%THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAPEER: $7k → 10%THE SERENITY HOUSE OF FLINT: $10k → 16%CHILD ADVOCACY TEAM: $10k → 16%FRIENDS OF BERSTON: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 84 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 84 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 220 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
602

Total granted

$2.3M
$6.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+38%

Still filing today

2%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O3
    OWOSSO 3 CINEMA INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k
  • TS
    TOP SHELF HOSPITALITY LLC DBA WROU
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k
  • WH
    WILLIAM HERRON DBA BEAGIO'S PIZZA O
    2× · 2020–2021 · $35k

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2020 · $221k
  • MC
    Mott Community College
    one grant, 2020 · $90k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $74k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Plymouth Canton Little League

Youth baseball and softball recreational league

—
2
Macomb County Chamber of Commerce

The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.

Unclassified
3
Child Welfare Society of Flint
—
4
Gratiot Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and community growth and development and prepserve the competitive enterprise system of business.

—
5
Flint Community Players Inc

Community stage productions are featured for residents in Genesee County. Local talent is selected for acting roles.

Arts & Culture
6
Flint Circuit Council On Family Violence Inc Dba Haven House

To help women, men, and children live without fear of violence within their home.

—
7
Hospice Homes of Genesee and Lapeer Counties

To provide housing and end of life care and support to terminally ill individuals.

Human Services
8
Detroit Country Club

Operate and maintain public golf course in the detroit lakes area; provide recreation for all ages

Recreation & Sports
9
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
10
Michigan Club Squash
Recreation & Sports
11
Michigan Knights of Columbus Charities
Community Improvement
12
Hispanic Technology & Community Center of Greater Flint

The mission of the Latinx Technology and Community Center is to enhance the dignity and quality of life for the Flint & Genesee County Latinx community and other cultures

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocacy Center of Lapeer Co; the most unlike its peers is Heaven Sent Community Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 906 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $220,909 · Other+194 more: $4,342,147 · Other+194 moreCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $31,500 · Recreation & SportsMILLINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsLAPEER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $43,960 · Community ImprovementOWOSSO COMMUNITY PLAYERS: $20,000 · Arts & CultureKettering University: $18,740 · Education
Other$4,563,056Recreation & Sports$56,500Community Improvement$43,960Arts & Culture$20,000Education$18,740

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAPEER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $43,960 over 1y, 20% of budgetCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $31,500 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetMILLINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $25,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetOWOSSO COMMUNITY PLAYERS: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetKettering University: $18,740 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANILAC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16,500 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAPEER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater FlintMI27.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Flint · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Nartel Family Foundation · Ruth Mott Foundation · Burroughs Memorial Trust · Merkley Charitable Trust · The Hagerman Foundation · Anna Paulina Foundation · Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable Trust · Foundation for Flint · United Way of Genesee County · Comerica Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flint and Genesee Chamber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flint and Genesee Chamber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 906 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Flint and Genesee Chamber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph