Skip to content

· Private foundation

Five Partners Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$275kArts & Culture$56kFood & Nutrition$33kCivil Rights$1kYouth Development$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $6,775, the rows itemized in this filing. The $11,775 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,775
Median grant
—
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Musicambia$3,000
WGBH Educational Foundation$2,775
Decoda$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $71k → 10%JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER: $5k → 9%WOODSTOCK BYRDECLIFFE GUILD: $2k → 16%NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $5k → 17%PERSIMMON TREE: $3k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE DIV OF MUSIC: $1k → 7%WINTER HARBOR MUSIC: $5k → 11%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $35k → 10%BEDFORD HILLS HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $75 → 9%NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $3k → 17%WINTER HARBOR MUSIC: $5k → 11%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $18k → 10%MT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $9k → 9%BELFORD PBA: $500 → 17%WINTER HARBOR MUSIC: $5k → 11%MT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 9%COLLEGE & COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP: $100 → 17%BEDFORD HILLS FREE LIBRARY: $9k → 9%COLLEGE & COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP: $100 → 17%MT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 9%JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $105k → 17%BEDFORD HILLS FREE LIBRARY: $7k → 9%METROPOLITAN OPERA: $6k → 17%HUDSON LINK: $5k → 9%FRACTURED ATLAS: $5k → 17%HUDSON LINK: $4k → 9%JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $5k → 17%FRACTURE ATLAS: $1k → 17%JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 9 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$242k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+94%

Still filing today

78%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    JUILLIARD SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $115k · revenue +58%
  • BM
    BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $53k · revenue +37%
  • TM
    THE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $20k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • MK
    Mount Kisco Interfath Food PA
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • MK
    Mount Kisco Interfaith Food PA
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • BH
    Bedford Hills Free Library
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
2
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Bennington College Corporation

The men and women who brought bennington college into being sought to create a college that would emphasize "the individual student and her developing interests," learning "by activity and living", a community life designed to "break down…

Education
8
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
9
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
10
Barnard College

Barnard college aims to provide the highest quality liberal arts education to promising and high-achieving young women, offering the unparalleled advantages of an outstanding residential college in partnership with a major research…

Education
11
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Juilliard School; the most unlike its peers is Winter Harbor Music Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUILLIARD SCHOOL: $115,000 · EducationJUILLIARD SCHOOLCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $70,600 · EducationCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGEBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $52,500 · EducationBRYN MAWR COLLEGEBEDFORD HILLS FREE LIBRARY: $15,000 · EducationBEDFORD HILLS FREE LIBRARYMusicambia: $10,500 · OtherMusicambiaIndividual grant recipient: $8,600 · OtherIndividual grant rec…Mount Kisco Interfath Food PA: $6,500 · OtherMount Kisco Interfat…Mount Kisco Interfaith Food PA: $6,000 · OtherMount Kisco Interfai…Bedford Hills Free Library: $6,000 · OtherBedford Hills Free L…METROPOLITAN OPERA: $5,500 · OtherMETROPOLITAN OPERANYU LANGONE HEALTH: $5,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEALTHWinter Harbor Music Festival: $5,000 · OtherWinter Harbor Music …WGBH Educational Foundation: $2,775 · OtherNYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $2,500 · OtherAperture Foundation: $2,500 · Other+7 more: $6,375 · Other+7 moreWINTER HARBOR MUSIC FESTIVAL: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePERSIMMON TREE INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $200 · Youth Development
Education$253,100Other$67,250Arts & Culture$28,500Philanthropy$20,000Youth Development$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $70,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $52,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD HILLS FREE LIBRARY: $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD HILLS FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds WINTER HARBOR MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PERSIMMON TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Five Partners Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Five Partners Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Five Partners Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Five Partners Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Five Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph