Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fishel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$91kHuman Services$52kEducation$37kHousing & Shelter$27kEmployment$24kPhilanthropy$18kYouth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$5,000
GILDAS CLUB$5,000
DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION$5,000
YOUTH VILLAGES$5,000
SAFE HAVEN$4,000
GOODWILL FOUNDATION OF$3,500
HOMEWORK HOTLINE$3,000
SAMARITAN RECOVERY COMMUNITY$3,000
PENCIL$3,000
URBAN HOUSING SOLUTIONS$3,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$3,000
PARK CENTER$3,000
HOLOCAUST & HUMANITY CENTER$2,500
SENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE$2,500
OASIS CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUTH VILLAGES: $5k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES: $5k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES: $5k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES: $5k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES: $5k → 14%SENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE: $3k → 14%SENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE: $3k → 14%SENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 28 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
3

Total granted

$290k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+81%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +74%
  • PC
    PARK CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +83%
  • PF
    PENCIL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • GC
    GILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +81%
  • U
    USN
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
2
Mental Health Cooperative Inc

Mental health cooperative inc. (mhc) provides integrated health services that include behavioral health care, primary health care, addiction services, and community-based care management. mhc also provides emergency psychiatric services…

Health
3
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
4
Our Place Nashville

To empower adults with developmental disabilities by providing affordable housing, work that is meaningful and an inclusive community in which to live.

Housing & Shelter
5
Michael Dunn Center

To empower individuals living with disabilities and challenges to gain independence

Human Services
6
Needlink Nashville

Provide needy families and individuals with rent and utilities assistance in order to prevent their eviction or termination of utility services. also provide food and other assistance to needy families and individuals.

—
7
Nashvillehealth

Nashvillehealth creates a culture of health and wellbeing by serving as a convener to open dialogue, aligning resources and building smart strategic partnerships to create a plan for health unique to nashvilles needs.

Health
8
Nashville Public Media Inc

Nashville banner is a locally owned, community supported, civic news organization. we exist to empower the people of nashville to make informed decisions by providing non-partisan journalism from an independent, nonprofit newsroom. we are…

Arts & Culture
9
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Nashville

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
10
Tennessee Justice Center Inc

The tennessee justice center (tjc) advocates on behalf of low-income tennesseans in areas of public policy having the greatest impact on their health and welfare.

Crime & Legal
11
Mental Health Association of Middle Tennessee

Our mission is to improve the lives of persons living with mental health challenges by advocating for improved public policy, educating health service providers, and connecting individuals to the right help at the right time.

Health
12
University Community Health Service

To provide accessible affordable, holistic healthcare to patients across the lifespan with a special focus on vulnerable populations, within a financially sustainable delivery model. further, uchs supports health professions education,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oasis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAFE HAVEN INC: $18,500 · OtherSAFE HAVEN INCJEWISH FEDERATION: $18,446 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $14,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKGILDAS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherGILDAS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherOUR KIDS CENTER: $5,500 · OtherVANDERBILT HILLEL: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF: $5,000 · OtherMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $13,500 · OtherMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INCThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education: $12,500 · OtherThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Educa…+6 more: $11,000 · Other+6 moreDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION …MAYO CLINIC: $25,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICSamaritan Recovery Community Inc: $9,000 · HealthSamaritan Recovery Commu…GILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENN…The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $4,000 · HealthThe Heimerdinger Foundat…THE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER: $3,000 · HealthHOMEWORK HOTLINE INC: $15,500 · EducationHOMEWORK HOT…PENCIL FOUNDATION: $15,500 · EducationPENCIL FOUND…Book Em: $6,000 · EducationBook EmYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLA…SENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR RIDE…ABE'S GARDEN: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterURBAN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $9,300 · Housing & ShelterOASIS CENTER INC: $13,000 · Community ImprovementGOODWILL FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,500 · Community ImprovementPARK CENTER INC: $18,000 · Employment
Other$124,946Health$71,000Education$37,000Human Services$32,500Housing & Shelter$22,300Community Improvement$18,500Employment$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CENTER INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWORK HOTLINE INC: $15,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetPENCIL FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS CENTER INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABE'S GARDEN: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education: $12,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $9,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSamaritan Recovery Community Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBook Em: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Heimerdinger Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds PARK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWORK HOTLINE INC ↗
  • Who funds PENCIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA O'BRYAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ABE'S GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education ↗
  • Who funds URBAN HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Recovery Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR RIDE NASHVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Book Em ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds The Heimerdinger Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW BEGINNINGS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hca Healthcare FoundationTN27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Frist Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Joe C Davis Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Eisen-Wald Foundation · The Annette & Irwin Eskind Family Foundation · The Blum Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fishel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fishel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fishel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph