Skip to content

· Private foundation

First National Bank Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$315kEducation$76kPhilanthropy$49kArts & Culture$12kHuman Services$11kRecreation & Sports$10kEmployment$6kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$780k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOODLAND USD 352$20,511
SHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
NWKS AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHO$6,000
SHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICE$5,000
LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS INC$2,500
GOODLAND ARTS COUNCIL INC$2,000
SHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN$1,500
NWKSDFF$1,489
NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
COLBY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$1,000
BENEDICTINE COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS INC: $3k → 10%SHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN: $2k → 13%SHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 14 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$130k
$334k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+31%

Still filing today

29%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GOODLAND ACTIVITIES CENTER
    4× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +258%
  • MS
    MAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +23%
  • SC
    SHERMAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • GR
    Goodland Regional Medical Center
    one grant, 2020 · $315k
  • NK
    NORTHWEST KANSAS TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheridan County Historical Society Incorporated

The mission shall be to bring together those people interested in history and especially the history of sheridan county, ks. understanding the history of our community is basic to our democratic way of life, gives us a better understanding…

Arts & Culture
2
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
3
Seward Arts Council
—
4
Manitou Art Center

Creating an environment in which artists can flourish creatively and professionaly in a mutually enriching relationship.

—
5
The Sherman Museum

Preservation and education of history and historical items of interest for the citizens and visitors of sherman, tx.

Arts & Culture
6
Kenosha Co Archaeological Society
Arts & Culture
7
Sixty Plus Club of Sh Co Ks Inc

Senior center

—
8
Wasco Co Historical Museum
Arts & Culture
9
Shelby County Fair Association

Conduct the annual county fair

Recreation & Sports
10
Cowboy State Daily

Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.

Arts & Culture
11
North Main Neighborhood Association

To stimulate the revitalization of the north main district of sheridan, wyoming, through perserving and ehancing its historic character, creating a positive image for the area, improving design and appearance with beautification projects,…

Community Improvement
12
Sand Springs Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote and grow local businesses and grow and develop the local community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sherman County Community; the most unlike its peers is Newman University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Goodland Regional Medical Center: $315,260 · OtherGoodland Regional Medical CenterGoodland USD 352: $43,215 · OtherGoodland USD 352Sherman County Community Foundation: $41,303 · OtherSherman County Community Foundation+25 more: $53,442 · Other+25 moreGOODLAND ACTIVITIES CENTER: $8,567 · Recreation & SportsMAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC: $6,500 · Arts & CultureGOODLAND ARTS COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSherman County Community Services Inc: $5,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Community ImprovementLivewell Northwest Kansas Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesSHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY: $2,500 · Human ServicesColorado Christian University: $848 · EducationBenedictine College: $500 · EducationNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $500 · Education
Other$453,220Recreation & Sports$8,567Arts & Culture$8,500Community Improvement$8,000Human Services$5,000Education$1,848

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOODLAND ACTIVITIES CENTER: $8,567 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetMAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC: $6,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSherman County Community Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSHERMAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetGREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLivewell Northwest Kansas Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Christian University: $848 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODLAND ACTIVITIES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET ART COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Sherman County Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER NORTHWEST KANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Livewell Northwest Kansas Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHERMAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds GOODLAND ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dane G Hansen FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dane G Hansen Foundation · Greater Northwest Kansas Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First National Bank Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First National Bank Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First National Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph