Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fiondella Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$85kEducation$78kHealth$55kYouth Development$43kArts & Culture$22kRecreation & Sports$5kInternational$3kEnvironment$3k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$552k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE$35,000
AMY'S ANGEL INC$7,000
NEW FOUNDATIONS INC$6,000
CROMWELL LITTLE LEAGUE$6,000
BIRDIES FOR CHARITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%New Foundations Inc: $7k → 11%New Foundations Inc: $7k → 11%New Foundations Inc: $6k → 11%NEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $6k → 11%NEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $6k → 11%NEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $6k → 11%NEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $5k → 11%New Foundations Inc: $5k → 11%New Foundations Inc: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 32% of Fiondella Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 98% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Fiondella Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$195k · 7 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$195k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+3%

Still filing today

57%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NEW FOUNDATIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +49%
  • AA
    AMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +49%
  • LV
    LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF GREATER HARTFORD INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BB
    BRISTOL BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIAT
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • FL
    Fanciscan Life Center
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • IM
    IMAGINATION MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION — $40,000 · OtherAMY'S ANGELS CORPORATIONLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF GREATER HARTFORD INC — $25,000 · OtherLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF GREATER HARTFORD INCThe Salvation Army — $24,500 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyShephard Meadow Therapeutic Riding Center Inc — $15,000 · OtherShephard Meadow Therapeutic Riding Center IncAMY'S ANGEL INC — $14,700 · OtherAMY'S ANGEL INCBRISTOL BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIAT — $14,000 · OtherBRISTOL BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATFanciscan Life Center — $7,500 · OtherIMAGINATION MUSEUM — $7,000 · OtherCROMWELL LITTLE LEAGUE — $6,000 · Other+5 more — $20,600 · Other+5 moreNEW FOUNDATIONS INC — $53,000 · Human ServicesNEW FOUNDATIONS INCPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $35,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLE…THE COVENANT PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $7,000 · EducationTHE COVENANT PRE…Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc — $23,000 · Youth Development
Other$174,300Human Services$53,000Education$42,000Youth Development$23,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW FOUNDATIONS INC — $53,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION — $40,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF GREATER HARTFORD INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc — $23,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COVENANT PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW FOUNDATIONS INC
  • Who funds AMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF GREATER HARTFORD INC
  • Who funds Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc
  • Who funds THE COVENANT PREPARATORY SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fiondella Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • New Foundations Inc100% of income from government
  • Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc2% of income from government
  • Literacy Volunteers of Greater Hartford Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fiondella Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fiondella Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph