Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Finistere Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$5.0MHealth$1.3MCivil Rights$650kInternational$200kPhilanthropy$100kScience & Tech$80kArts & Culture$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK GENOME CENTER$600,000
ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$500,000
CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA$282,398
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION$200,000
ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS$100,000
EVERYORG$50,000
HARVARD SCIENCE OF THE HUMAN PAST INITIATIVE DISCRETIONARY FUND$20,000
PRO PUBLICA INC$10,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS: $100k → 8%EVERYORG: $50k → 10%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $65k → 17%ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS: $100k → 20%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION: $200k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS: $100k → 8%EVERYORG: $50k → 10%EVERYORG: $50k → 17%ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS: $100k → 20%ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS INC: $100k → 8%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $550k → 17%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $550k → 17%HARVARD SCIENCE OF THE HUMAN PAST INITIATIVE DISCRETIONARY FUND: $20k → 8%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $550k → 17%HARVARD SCIENCE OF THE HUMAN PAST INITIATIVE DISCRETIONARY FUND: $20k → 8%THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $500k → 17%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $500k → 17%ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $500k → 17%NEW YORK GENOME CENTER: $600k → 17%NEW YORK GENOME CENTER: $325k → 17%NEW YORK GENOME CENTER: $325k → 17%PRO PUBLICA INC: $10k → 17%PRO PUBLICA INC: $10k → 17%PRO PUBLICA INC: $10k → 17%PRO PUBLICA INC: $10k → 17%CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $321k → 17%CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $320k → 17%CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $282k → 17%CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $67k → 17%AMERICA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC DEVELOPMENT: $500k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC DEVELOPMENT: $100k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 9 repeat orgs$615k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$6.5M
$615k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+55%

Still filing today

78%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +21%
  • CI
    CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +87%
  • TA
    THE ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $65k · revenue +55%
  • E
    EVERYORG
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge

The mission of the university of cambridge is to contribute to society through the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. organizationally, we achieve this through two divisions…

3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

12
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cambridge in America and the most unlike its peers is Every Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,150,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY+3 more — $145,183 · EducationNEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC — $1,250,000 · HealthNEW YORK GENOME CEN…AMERICA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC DEVELOPMENT — $500,000 · OtherAMERICA CIVIL LIBER…THE ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS INC — $500,000 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATION OF …AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC DEVELOPMENT — $150,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBE…EVERYORG — $50,000 · Other+1 more — $40,000 · OtherCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA — $1,230,776 · InternationalCAMBRIDGE IN AMERI…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $200,000 · PhilanthropyEVERY ORG — $100,000 · PhilanthropyPRO PUBLICA INC — $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$3,295,183Health$1,250,000Other$1,240,000International$1,230,776Philanthropy$300,000Arts & Culture$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC — $1,250,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA — $1,230,776 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS INC — $500,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY ORG — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $65,183 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NEW YORK GENOME CENTER INC
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF MARSHALL SCHOLARS INC
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
  • Who funds EVERY ORG
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Finistere Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Finistere Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Finistere Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph