Skip to content
Finch Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Finch Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$90kHealth$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$424k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
HAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$12,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC$10,000
HAVADOPT$5,000
SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%GULF COAST KIDS HOUSE: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 5 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$122k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+26%

Still filing today

20%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA
    6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $35k
  • TW
    The Warrior Connection Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue -13%

Funded once

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +26%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +24%
  • HC
    HOLTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tmc Health Foundation

The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

Health
2
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
3
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
4
Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc

Together with our donors, we transform our region through bold and proactive philanthropy.

Philanthropy
5
Waco Family Practice Foundation

Support of direct service missions of mclennan county medical education & research foundation & heart of texas community health center.

Health
6
Tmc Healthcare

Our mission is to provide exceptional health care with compassion.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
10
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
11
Healthcare for the Homeless-Houston

Non-profit corporation providing healthcare to the homeless.

Human Services
12
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE: $15,000 · OtherFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICEHAVADOPT: $7,000 · OtherHAVADOPTBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC: $5,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INCSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T…Ronald McDonald House Global: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDonal…HAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropyHAVASU COMMUN…HOLTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHOLTON COMMUN…The Warrior Connection Inc: $20,000 · Public BenefitThe Warrior…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGULF COAST KID'S HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$62,000Housing & Shelter$45,000Health$25,000Philanthropy$22,000Public Benefit$20,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $45,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe Warrior Connection Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLTON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGULF COAST KID'S HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Finch Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Finch Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Gulf Coast Kid's House Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Finch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home