· Private foundation
Fidelia E Plett Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| BETHEL COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| MENNONITE MISSION NETWORK | $5,000 |
| OFFENDER VICTIM MINISTRIES INC | $5,000 |
| VICTORY VILLAGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| ANABAPTIST MENNONITE BIBLICAL SEMIN | $3,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BCBETHEL COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +124%
- OMOFFENDERVICTIM MINISTRIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +5%
- PVPLEASANT VIEW HOME4× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- SASEXUAL ASSAULTDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCone grant, 2017 · $4k
- BMBUHLER MENNONITE CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $2k
- PVPrairie View Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +63%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide housing and services to low income senior adults
The Center is dedicated to providing multi-disciplinary mental health services to individuals, couples, and families in the greater Charlotte community regardless of age, gender, race, ethnicity, faith, or sexual orientation. In addition,…
Providing a safe and therapeutic community to empower families to break the cycle of addiction.
BethHaven is designed to provide a supervised family-type residence for adults with severe and persistent mental illness. For more than 30 years BethHaven has provided top quality residential services for adults with severe and persistent…
Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises
Provide housing and services to low income senior adults
Provides housing and related services to low income senior adults.
Christ-based ministry with the mission of bringing hope and encouragement with christ-like love to emotionally hurting people through mental health counseling and transitonal housing for homeless women with mental illness.
Provide housing and services to low income senior adults
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.
Long term psychiatric care facility.providing educational and psychological & psychiatric assistance to residents learning to function as contributing society members.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Horizons · Central Kansas Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Fidelia E Plett Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fidelia E Plett Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Fidelia E Plett’s filings →