Skip to content

· Public charity

Female Charitable Society of Baldwinsville Inc

Our mission is to assist neighbors in need in the community.

$14k
Granted FY2021
10
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$23kHuman Services$2kHealth$575Environment$200Public Safety & Disaster$200Religion$50
02FY2021 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALDWINSVILLE FOOD PANTRY$5,663
MEALS ON WHEELS$5,662
Individual grant recipient$1,200
BALDWINSVILLE VOLUNTEER CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$100
GREATER BALDWINSVILLE AMBULANCE CORPS$100
BVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY$100
ARC OF ONONDAGA$75
PARK CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$50
WOMEN'S GARDEN CLUB OF BALDWINSVILLE$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARC OF ONONDAGA: $75 → 14%BALDWINSVILLE VOLUNTEER CENTER: $1k → 14%Baldwinsville Volunteer Center: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 3 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$23k
$700

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+337%
+659%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21
Human ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BALDWINSVILLE FOOD PANTRY
    2× · 2017–2021 · $11k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    2× · 2017–2021 · $11k
  • BV
    BALDWINSVILLE VOLUNTEER CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +337%

Funded once

  • KC
    KEYS CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +659%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BALDWINSVILLE FOOD PANTRY: $10,663 · OtherBALDWINSVILLE FOOD PANTRYMEALS ON WHEELS: $10,662 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSIndividual grant recipient: $1,200 · Other+6 more: $600 · OtherBALDWINSVILLE VOLUNTEER CENTER INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesARC OF ONONDAGA FOUNDATION INC: $75 · Human ServicesKEYS CORP: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$23,125Human Services$1,575Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBALDWINSVILLE VOLUNTEER CENTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKEYS CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER BALDWINSVILLE AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARC OF ONONDAGA FOUNDATION INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BALDWINSVILLE VOLUNTEER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KEYS CORP ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BALDWINSVILLE AMBULANCE CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF ONONDAGA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Female Charitable Society of Baldwinsville Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Female Charitable Society of Baldwinsville Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Female Charitable Society of Baldwinsville Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Female Charitable Society of Baldwinsville Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Female Charitable Society of Baldwinsville’s filings →

    More from the funding graph